Originally Posted by XwChriswX I know that's been the comment, then how do you explain it working with the Stock headers when they have a heat shield around them, and
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-23-2011, 08:53 PM | #571 (permalink) | |
WFLYIDNNE
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In The Fastlane
Posts: 50,648
Drives: 02 GDB WRX
Rep Power: 452 |
Quote:
Looks pretty identical to me...
__________________
Bonnie - Stage 2, Audio build coming this fall! R.I.P. Abby 3/29/10 - 3/30/14 |
|
08-23-2011, 09:00 PM | #572 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 120
Drives: 09 Nismo Silver
Rep Power: 15 |
Agreed... strange indeed.
__________________
2009 Nismo 370Z #0136 The past... 2008 STi stock thanks to questionable ringlands, 2005 STi modded and very fast, 2004.5 350Z modded and fast-ish |
08-24-2011, 11:25 AM | #573 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 170
Drives: Canyonero
Rep Power: 16 |
Still confused why someone would go through the time to make a long tube head but not make it equal length.
Anyway since when is it GTMs responsibility to test their products for compatibility against other non OE manufacturers offerings? Maybe they didn't feel like spending the money and time to see if a part that offers them no income from sales fits w/ their kit. Maybe there is something that can't be seen in those pictures. Or maybe it is a heat issue. The fact that the OE piece is two layer steel + a heat shield (keeping more radiated heat inside the pipe) vs the aftermarket piece which is single wall tubing with no coatings or heat shields could play a big factor. |
08-24-2011, 12:03 PM | #574 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594 |
Quote:
Both seem to have done so, and they come to conflicting conclusions. I don't have enough personal data or expertise to weigh in any further than they have already. Some independent parties (e.g. theDreamer) have combined them and think there's no real issue given a proper tune though. Given FI's recounting of Shumby's experience, I'm not sure I put a lot of weight in that story one way or the other, just too little hard data and not enough experimenting done. For reference, the very bottom of the top post here has FI's conclusions: Fast Intentions Long Tube Headers are here! |
|
08-25-2011, 11:06 AM | #575 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 115
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
I think thats true. GTM should be concerned about there products. I can care less about the LTH. Especially at that price point. But i want to see the press release and any updated info. I heard sam is working on the Automatic SC install still? |
|
01-15-2014, 10:40 PM | #577 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In the D
Posts: 3,732
Drives: v8 74 260z ;)
Rep Power: 7251 |
Its quite simple really in a naturally aspirated engine with stock exhaust, the valve overlap on the engine allows the exhaust volume moving out of the head to scavenge the cylinder better allowing a greater intake volume to be pulled into the cylinder, it is timed up so that the valve closes before the intake charge begins to leave the exhaust valve. When you put headers on an NA car you improve the scavenging of the exhaust improving the intake charge to the point that just a little intake volume goes into the exhaust before the valve closes but the cylinder is filled with more intake charge regardless so it makes more power. On a supercharged car the intake charge is pressurized so that once the exhaust has vented enough that the cylinder pressure is equal to the intake pressure intake charge begins to flood out the exhaust valve long before it is closed, with a restrictor like a factory cat, or running a smaller exhaust diameter(2-2.5") with test pipes you allow manifold pressure to rise right at the critical point where the intake charge would over pressure the cylinder and flood out the open exhaust valve so the manifold back pressure holds the charge in.
This has been true for long before the 370z even came out, every supercharger kit manufacturer will warn about headers causing a loss in boost pressure, the fact is with a supercharger and the locked in cam timing the Z will make more power per cfm pumped into the engine with a restrictive exhaust. headers plus cam timing the way it is the engine wastes a large percentage of intake charge, so the header manufacturer tells you to get a bigger blower so that even though 10% of the intake charge is flying out the exhaust you will get your power back by shoving more in. The supercharger manufacturer tells you to put a more restrictive exhaust on the car so you waste less and get more pressure and power for the amount you spin the charger. In the end the both do the same thing you just have to pick whether you want headers and a more wasteful setup or a smaller setup that's more efficient. Now if you can change the valve timing, grab your self some headers and turn the overlap down and enjoy the best of both worlds. Like I said none of this is new it's neither companies fault it's just the way it is, thats why back in the 60's a thing called a blower cam was invented.
__________________
ANSWER PRICE LIST Answers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $0.75 Answers (requiring thought) - - - - $1.25 Answers (correct) - - - - - - - - - - $12.50 |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GTM Supercharger Stage 1 w/ F.I. LTH | theDreamer | Forced Induction | 140 | 03-16-2013 05:50 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Installation. | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 311 | 09-07-2011 04:42 AM |
GTM supercharger stage 1 videos | Fezzik | Forced Induction | 23 | 05-10-2011 12:34 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Install II. | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 254 | 08-11-2010 11:59 AM |