![]() |
I did not need a crazy amount of power nor did I care about the expandability of the TT.
I just wanted a bit over 400whp and mid 300TQ. |
Personally after driving both the sc and tt cars, I can see a reason for both. Even if you take cost out of the equation (which is a huge part of that decision for a lot of people), the supercharger just feels right for some cars. Gives you that V8 feel basically, and I think for a G that's perfect, it subtle, doesn't scream this car was modified, and keeps the luxury sport theme of the G. Now the Z, is all ready a bit more flashy so a big visible IC and healthy exhaust note are a bit more at home to me for this car, but still that's not for everyone, which is what makes GTMs supercharger kit perfect for some people. Really hard to explain until you drive the SC car.
|
I have a epic journey coming up and I can't wait till it's all done.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^ they do, but they are nowhere as popular as going catless.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I like the linear powerband that's on the supercharger kit. I don't feel the need for 400+ ft-lbs. It's hard enough getting 350 on the pavement, let alone more. Besides, whichever option you go with 1st and 2nd are pretty much useless on street tires anyway.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Other than getting LTH's to work, what's the purpose / expected gains? I heard there wasn't much at all to be gained from fiddling with the system since it already does a pretty damn good job from the factory. Don't get me wrong, I'd be all for running LTH's.
|
Quote:
This is what my input is at least on the matter, I'm sure Sam could shed a lot more light on this then I can. |
Quote:
It is more on the side of cams and such, it will help those with more open exhaust setups probably but maybe not. Right now they are going to use the FCON by HKS to test tuning with VVEL. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2