![]() |
Originally Posted by john370z Anyone know how much power is safe to push through the 7sp AT? i wanna say about 450. but no more then 500.
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Captin Canuck
![]() |
![]()
there is a G37 5AT that has tt'd and is stock and has 483 Whp and the tranny is doing fine.
__________________
Originally Posted by SAM@GTM Engine detonation is not normal and it should never never happen, and whoever told that need to do something else for living . Sam |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: bham al
Posts: 91
Drives: 05 g sedan 6mt
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
![]()
The prior 5ats were finicky. Some guys could hold +100hp/tq of boost for a couple years, and other guys would need valvebody work in a matter of weeks.
Give the 7at some time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Another problem was the shift speed on the old 5AT was so slow that the engine would overrev during the shift and hit the rev limiter on almost any FI application on the transmission (see some threads on it at my350z). You had to get a valve body upgrade (at about 1000 bucks) and reflash the rev limit higher to even start using that tranny and it was still weak. The new 7AT seems to be much better with faster shift speeds but it's kind of a wait and see. This tranny holds 390 hp on the FX45 w/o any problems and I assume it's gonna be somewhat over engineered.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,940
Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z
Rep Power: 705 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,853
Drives: 02 Corvette Z06
Rep Power: 590 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I want to see them make a mammoth blower for the 370... You'll gain 80HP just from efficiency alone.
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Totaled 2003 Corvette Z06 50th Anniversary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
The370Z.com Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,197
Drives: 2004 G35 Coupe 6MT
Rep Power: 534 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
That press release was issued by the builder of the car, who we had never spoken to.. they added us as a supercharger.. I don't know why.
![]() It wasn't STILLEN who was entering.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oildale, CA
Posts: 412
Drives: 2013 911 4S
Rep Power: 416 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Oh wow. Lol. That seems pretty shady. Not on Stillen's part... but it still is bad that your name got attached to a failed project.
Since you've told us that Stillen is planning on retaining the stock hood for their upcoming 370z supercharger project, can we assume that positive displacement supercharging is out? The underhood space is so small that the stock intake manifold is within millimeters of the hood. I think a ATI Procharger C2 would look sweet in there: ![]() Think you could fit something like that with a custom intake manifold that accomodates both stock throttle bodies on the left side of the manifold? You could go from the supercharger to intercooler to throttle bodies as a single pipe, all on the left side, then split it with a Y as it gets to the throttle bodies. I'm just dying to know what you guys are up to...... -Phim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA.
Posts: 1,205
Drives: 370Z Tour, Spt, 6mt
Rep Power: 645 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Yeah, throw us a bone here
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,940
Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z
Rep Power: 705 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Regressing back to my previous car (Mustang), positive displacement superchargers typically removed the intake manifold and sat nicely in the valley between the heads. I'm not too familiar with the VQ37VHR layout, but it could very well be likely that a positive displacement S/C can still fit if it can sit nicely in between the heads. Now, something unrelated: Personally, if its a positive displacement S/C, it has to be a twin screw to be worth my time. At the very least, an Eaton TVS blower would do. Supercharging the VQ37VHR would most likely need to be a positive displacement because of the DTB. I can easily see a positive displacement S/C replacing the manifold, and both throttle bodies and going to a larger, single intake pipe and filter. Just my ![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|