STILLEN 370Z Supercharger System - Announcement!!!

Zsteve

No Ive asked that today and nothing yet but its only been a few. I just want to make sure which ever kit I get is cooling efficiently and that there is no heat loss due to not enough cooling from the ICs.

__________________
2010 LS3 C6 Silver coupe corvette

fstrnldr

never messed with it, never intend to, if you want me to email the vid, i can do that, and you can upload it where ever you want. Not trying to come off as a **** or anything, i just really don't want to spend the time making an account (i'm assuming you have to) + my video is from the time they strap the car down to the end of the third pull, so its a good 7min long, not sure if there is any kind of limits to posting on you tube.

RCZ

Yeah, 10 minutes. If you send it to me, I'll put it on youtube. How big is the file?

fstrnldr

I think i have it taken care of, but i'll PM me you if not, that way we aren't cluttering up the thread any more than needed.

Kyle@STILLEN

The discussion of air to water and air to air intercoolers is currently going on in the GTM thread but I did not want to jump in on that thread so I will post our reasoning for air to water in this thread...

Please feel free to do any amount of research on this as you like. The results will always be the same. The bottom line is, water is a more efficient cooling method than air. Water is four times more efficient at dissipating heat than air. It's thermodynamics, not some STILLEN voodoo...It just is.

This is a pretty good explanation of the benefits of air to water intercooling:

Browser Warning

I don't know why this says browser warning but it works fine...

One of the other benefits of the air to water intercooling is that the heat exchanger in front does not consume all of the airflow to other vital coolers such as engine oil, power steering, automatic transmission fluid, a/c condenser.

yes, there is a bit more weight in the air to water intercoolers because you do have to account for the weight of the water and additional pumps, but we're talking fractions of a percent when comparing the overall power to weight ratio of the entire vehicle.

The other thing to consider is that the majority of O.E. manufacturer's with supercharged vehicle's use air to water:

Ford
Ford GT Supercar
Lightning
Ford GT500
Ford Mustang Cobra

GM
Corvette ZR-1
Cobalt SS

Toyota
TRD supercharger for the 07+ Tundra
TRD supercharger for the older Tacomas

Aftermarket supercharger manufacturers who use air to water intercooling:

Edelbrock
Vortech
Magnuson
Whipple
Kenne Bell
Saleen
Steeda

As everyone has said...Air to air is less expensive, if it was better, wouldn't major manufacturer's use it in their supercharged applications?

Xan

In that case let me post some more merits I also posted in the other thread in here as well, as I believe they support your point. Oh and add the Bugatti Veyron to that list as well.

From my post in the other thread:

As for the air to water cooling, you do not need to add ice to match the efficiency of an air to air cooler. Water is a more efficient to draw out heat, think about it, how many air cooled engines are there today? The possibility of adding ice is just an added benefit of this type of system as by doing so you can cool the intake air below ambient, something that is impossible to do with an air to air cooler. In reality this is only useful when you’re for instance doing a drag race.

An additional benefit is that typically an air to water cooling will have a lower pressure drop compared to an air to air cooler, based on their design.
Which as a result means the your SC can be used more efficiently for engine performance.

Another benefit is that you have more freedom where you place the intercooler with and air to water cooler then you have with an air to air cooler. So you can for instance avoid putting it in front of your radiator and not have air that has been heated up from your intercooler going into your radiator and making your engine cooling less effiecient. Which in the VQ engine is a welcome benefit)

And finally there is the fact that an air to water cooler has less trouble with heat soaking. When your car is standing still, either before an autox run or just in traffic, your air to air cooler isn’t cooling. However the pump on the air to water cooling is still running and will keep the temperature spikes from such a heat soak in control.

__________________

RCZ

Kyle, don't forget the Bugatti Veyron. I know its not SC, but its worth the mention.

Funny that the fastest production car in the world, one of the fastest production nurburgring lap cars and one of the most focused cars in the world use water-to-air cooling and somehow the system is inferior. (Veyron, ZR1 and Ariel Atom).

Xan, dont forget that the shorter piping also drastically improves throttle response. Also to add to your pressure drop comment. The SC will be able to run at 8psi to produce 8psi manifold pressure with the short piping and no pressure drop. If there is, lets say, a 1psi pressure drop in the IC system, then the SC will need to produce 9psi, theoretically speaking, to produce 8psi manifold pressure. I don't have to tell anyone here that the more you compress air and the harder/faster you make the sc work the more heat goes into the air to begin with and therefore the less effective the entire system becomes.

Funny also that they skipped over some search results that argued completely FOR water cooling and only picked out the ones that argue against it from websites that, Surprise!, sell air to air intercoolers. That's some seriously good research.

I was going to post something on their thread, but didn't want to deal with the arguing that was sure to come afterwards.

de_dust

great information kyle and xan... nobody questions the fact that water is a greater cooling efficiency than air... however the concern is it would be nice to have more information on how the stillen kit is design to provide and maintain this cooling efficiency.... how big is ur radiator, are you installing a fan with it, location, etc etc... so if u can provide that, it would be nice... also can you think of the possible reason why nissan never used water cooling... perhaps the GTR could have used it....

fstrnldr

Kyle you conveniently left out the fact that a good portion of those examples have no choice but to run air/water. Almost anything w/ a roots or twin screw style blower is going to be more than slightly difficult to make work w/ an air/air system. There are probably far more examples of factory forced induction cars operating w/ air/air rather than air/water.

That being said the biggest question i would have isn't what is better between air/water and air/air. I personally think they both have their places depending on the intended outcome of the build. The question would be is the system in question large enough to keep the temps under control for the vehicle/blower combination. The only way to prove or disprove this is w/ extended driving monitoring in and out air temps. Not 7 min of dyno runs on a "HOT" 72° day.

Buddy Revell

It appears that a large number of supercharged cars from the factory use air to water ICs. Why do a large number OEMs seem to prefer air to air instead for factory turbocharged cars?

__________________
'08 IP G37S/GTM Supercharger/20" DPE SP-5 Wheels/ARK GRIP Exhaust

RCZ

Really?

If I have to hear Kyle talk about all the real world testing that has gone into this car one more time I'm gonna throw up.

#1001 coming up - Cue Kyle - Go!

CGMobile370Z

I would like to see a parts layout of the whole S/C kit to see everything that is included. I could not imagine buying the kit blindly without seeing everything that is included in it.

__________________
370Z Touring/ Sports Package/ Stillen Gen3 Intake/ Stillen HFC/ NST Underdive Overdrive Pulleys/ FI Cat Back Exhaust/ Custom Headlights

Kyle@STILLEN

I will gather this information and post it soon. What I can confirm right now without having exact dimensions is that the bar and plate heat exchanger that we use on this supercharger system has more surface area than the old tube and fin heat exchangers that we use on the Titan and 350Z kits...Which is actually the same heat exchanger that Magnusson uses on their Corvette supercharger systems.

You are correct and I should have written a bit more in that post clarifying that there is no need to be concerned about reliability. The primary thing I was trying to point out is that it is reliable enough for some of the largest manufacturer's out there.

You bring up a good point about the need for air to water intercooling in those applications. Another thing I left out of my last post is that one of the primary reasons companies like Bugatti, Ford, or GM choose air to water intercooling over air to air is airflow...Not just the air traveling through the intercooler or directly in front/around it. What else can that air be doing? Take a look at just about every car that comes from the factory with an air to air intercooler and look at the placement of that intercooler. It is almost never a front mount. GT R intercoolers are on the side. 300ZX intercoolers are side mounted, Toyota Supra intercoolers are side mounted, Subaru WRX intercoolers are top mounted. Why is this?

Because the engineers at those manufacturer's understand that fresh airflow to all of the vehicle's coolers is extremely important. The goal is always to get fresh airflow to each cooler. By mounting a large front mount intercooler directly in front of all of the other coolers means that the second or in some cases third and fourth row of coolers are not seeing fresh air. By the time those coolers see outside air it has already been heated by the intercooler, oil cooler, auto trans cooler, power steering cooler, a/c condenser...you see where I'm going with this.

I am trying hard to convince our engineer's to let me take apart the black car again. Just to take off the fascia so that we can take a picture to show you what I'm talking about. Fortunately, and unfortunately, our engineer's are more concerned with testing and putting miles on the car than they are about marketing.

You also bring up a great point about "The only way to prove or disprove this is w/ extended driving monitoring in and out air temps. Not 7 min of dyno runs on a "HOT" 72° day."

We have done this...Our 5AT G37 coupe was tested at El Toro air force base for high speed runs, heat soak testing (0-140 MPH run after 10 minute heat soak to check heat exchangers ability to dissipate heat from coolant), drifting/abusive testing (tight radius, low speed high RPM turns which keeps airflow low but heat high.) and much much more...

Also, Steve Millen has taken our 6MT red 370Z to Las Vegas, Nevada and back. Then he took it to Virginia City and back with a stop off in Mammoth in freezing temperatures to check the performance of the intercooler and supercharger system in cold climates. Steve stayed the night in Mammoth after a snow storm, let the car sit overnight and fired it back up in the morning. On this trip the car went through high elevation, and cold weather testing.

I personally have also driven the red Z on numerous occasions, sometimes even to local car shows like the Cerritos meet.

Yesterday our head mechanic took our customer's 7AT black 370Z to Baker and back...accidentally missing the 91 freeway entrance and going to Temecula instead...another 350 mile round trip.

We have thousands of miles of testing completed so far. We have the kits driving around the streets on three vehicle's with three different transmission setups so we can make sure that the kit works perfectly on each.

Kyle@STILLEN

So would I! LOL

We've actually taken these photos but they looked realy bad and the light/white background made everything way to white and it just didn't look good. We used some of the prototype pieces for those photos and now those parts are on the cars that we're testing with. We're still waiting on some of the final components of the kits to come in but as soon as they get here it is a priority for Josh and I to get everything together for a photo.

BalanBro

I apologize if this was answered already, but what additive is used to prevent freezing? Is it an antifreeze mix?