![]() |
hope everything will work out eventually!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok, so wifedrivens numbers are 368hp 279tq on a mustang dyno with stillens SC kit. Best numbers ive see NA so far on a mustang is 324/250(someone actually made 330+hp but could have been a fluke). So for 8-10 grand you get an extra 40hp and 30tq give or take. I realize elevation, temps, etc all are variables in this equation. But seriously.... 8-10grand for what? :wtf2:
|
:wtf2:i know what I would do with 8-10k...
|
Quote:
i also hope you get refunds on your kits... if not BBB might also be an option? |
Quote:
|
Search Semtex profile. I believe he has his dyno sheets up, and was one of the 320+ rwhp members. Also RCZ was at 310 before his SC. personally im at 300/233 on the stock tune on a mustang dyno. For me it would be a gain of 60hp and 30tq give or take a few (once im tuned) or 70/40 if i retain stock tune.
Anyone with a better dyno than mine that can post up? http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/o...z/IMG_0273.jpg |
You cannot compare your dyno run on dyno X against another like this.
The way to compare the progress or performance of these kits is to show the pre-kit dyno run and post kit installed & tuned. |
^^^ I agree to a certain extent... But i still would expect SC numbers to blow NA numbers out of the water. Regardless of diff dyno, day, heat, elevation.. etc.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If this was a valid comparison, i would have to say 70hp and 50tq is a lot! especially on a mustang dyno. Im just not convinced its price to power ratio is were i want it to be. If i was a pure baller, throwing hundies in the air cause i can. Then maybe.. |
Oops sorry phone sent it again
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2