![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
The simplest way to explain the difference between the two is that absolute pressure uses absolute zero as its zero point, while gauge pressure uses atmospheric pressure as its zero point. Due to varying atmospheric pressure, gauge pressure measurement is not precise, while absolute pressure is always definite |
Quote:
|
I was just reporting the readings, and making a point that I wasn’t even selecting the highest one, since there was a lot of disbelief over my numbers. Having said that, Eugene says boost recorded by dynos are typically lower because they use a longer vacuum tube to reach their sensor. Vacuum loss over longer runs. I still hit high 14’s on the dyno I believe. I don’t understand why an unknown dyno with unknown sensors and vacuum tube length is somehow more believable or comparable than the equipment virtually everyone here owns. Probably a 4 bar OMNI-Power sensor, a couple feet of tube, and ECUTEK software. These are all constants, so why not rely on them instead of insisting on boost numbers from a dyno?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
With my intake and filter, 9 psi pulley, and On E53, I made 618 WHP and 452 WTQ @ 14.7 psi. I’m guessing that’s a boost record for a filtered 9 psi pulley setup. I don’t even see turbo guards making that kind of boost. |
Quote:
Looks great! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here it is on the dyno. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xszPWzswNU
Back on topic... I've ordered a new printer that will allow me to print in more heat resistant and much stronger materials. Specifically Nylon, and the one I'm most excited about, Polycarbonate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2