JARblue |
02-03-2015 12:47 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by COSMO
(Post 3100624)
Ok lets go over our words here.. (wouldn't) short for (would not).. The bp kit would not be a bad choice.. Tomorrow we will cover another word... lol
|
:facepalm:
You're the one using a damn double (or triple? I can't tell) negative. Your post that I quoted (it is still there) said "not saying bp would be a bad choice". This is what I assumed you meant, despite your earlier :stirthepot: comment about Sasha's disciples. You can also read this statement as 'bp would be a good choice'.
Then you tried to change would to wouldn't. So now your statement reads "not saying bp wouldn't be a bad choice". This is a fuckin triple negative that can also be read as 'bp would be a bad choice'.
So I questioned your correction, and you proceed to chastise me for your lack of understanding of the English language? I don't think so :gtfo2:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwick
(Post 3100627)
So can tomorrow's lesson be on the meaning of, or better yet, not using double negatives:tup:
|
No $hit. He's giving me grammar lessons? Seriously? I'm a fuckin grammar Nazi lol
Sorry for the off topic :tiphat:
|