![]() |
I wonder for the z car enthusiasts with children if they will someday make a 2+2 version of the car. The problem I can see with that is the weight
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 330
Drives: 03 ep3 vbp 6speed
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
I wonder for the z car enthusiasts with children if they will someday make a 2+2 version of the car. The problem I can see with that is the weight will increase and all of the dementions that were bragged about versus the 350 will be neligate
__________________
I have a 350rwhp 1973 18rg turbo powered Toyota celica, a 2003 civic si which will be my down payment for a beautiful MONTEREY BLUE 370z. THE370Z.COM F'IN RULES! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N Italy, lake Maggiore
Posts: 399
Drives: black Lev2 370Z
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
no, in my opinion it's the same as the V8 version: no 2seater and no V8. It wouldn't be a real Z. And in both case they should re-study and re-project
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Grand Prix of Endurance
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 26 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I believe the 280 was a 2+2, that didn't sell!
Nissan won't make that mistake again.
__________________
![]() We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,853
Drives: 02 Corvette Z06
Rep Power: 590 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
^^^
^^^ Yep. G37 is for the family man that loves a sports car... It's not a Z, but it's close. Worried about it that much? Get a family van and a Z! ![]()
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Totaled 2003 Corvette Z06 50th Anniversary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,853
Drives: 02 Corvette Z06
Rep Power: 590 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
^^ Yep and thankfully made the purpose of them different enough to justify which ever one you buy.
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Totaled 2003 Corvette Z06 50th Anniversary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]()
There were several 2+2 Z cars. I believe there was a 280Z and there was a 280ZX version as well as both 300ZXs came in a 2+2 version. The only reason I think they won't go the 2+2 route is because the G37 definately covers that and I think they are trying hard to get back to the roots of the original 240Z which was an incredible price/performance two seater sports car.
2+2 was there to give the family man an "in" to get his sports car and still have room to pick the kids up from school, etc. The 280Z and 280ZX 2+2 were ugly (IMHO of course) because they extended the roof line. The Z31 was just ugly 2 seater or 2+2 - reminded me of the Mustang II - great line of cars with a hicup in the middle... they kinda saved the Z31 in '88 and '89 with the European style rounded bumpers which made it look less like a flying wedge. The Z32 2+2 had subtle details (gas cap placement IIRC) to differentiate between the 2 and 2+2 version but they were unnoticed by the casual observer. The Z32 was definately the best 2+2 of all the Zs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 330
Drives: 03 ep3 vbp 6speed
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
Yeah the g does cover that route you are 100% correct. My mom had the 1985 300zx 2+2 and it was a blast.
__________________
I have a 350rwhp 1973 18rg turbo powered Toyota celica, a 2003 civic si which will be my down payment for a beautiful MONTEREY BLUE 370z. THE370Z.COM F'IN RULES! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|