![]() |
So I figured since I didn't have much going on this long weekend I'd do a sound proofing project on the Z to see if it makes a difference. My
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kali
Posts: 54
Drives: 12 370z
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
![]()
So I figured since I didn't have much going on this long weekend I'd do a sound proofing project on the Z to see if it makes a difference.
My goal was to get the most gains without going crazy and tearing the entire interior out or using 30+lbs of sound insulation. I went with my left over Dynamat and Frost king which you can source at the local home depot (2 of which didn't have it, FML) at 18.99 a roll. A few comments to those that are thinking about frost king. 1. It isn't all that cheap. 18.99 gets you ~15 sq feet so about 1/2 the price of dynamat but given the way the material feels etc it may not be worth while. 2. It is very light 1/4 of the weight of dynamat, and I am not sure the sound insulation properties of this material by itself are good because they lack mass/density etc, but since I bought it I decided to use it. 3. It does have a slight smell on the glue layer, once you apply it it goes away (since it isn't exposed) but ... it could come back, I wouldn't use rolls of this **** in the car since it will likely smell. Dynamat is pretty much odor free. I pulled apart the trunk of my Z which was surprisingly easy/quick. My first try took me about 30 min, if I was to pull it apart again, I can likely do it in 15 min or less. No broken clips or anything. My strategy was to supplement factory sound deadening and add to flimsy/high noise areas. I put dynamat down as a baselayer, and put frost king on top since dynamat is the heavier more dense product. I used about 10sq feet of dynamat ~4lbs. And I used about 10sq feet of Frost king ~1-2lbs. Total of 5lbs. Overall the results were somewhat disappointing same as my golf where I did my entire trunk with dynamat. The car does seem a bit quieter but bad roads are still really shitty. I took 3 separate measurements all at around 65-70mph on the same stretches of road. Bad pavement 82-83 after 80-81 ok pavement 75-76 after 73-74 Good pavement 72-73 after 70-71 Overall I'd say it cut about 2-3 db out at best. Is it noticeable, yes... slightly. I was hoping for a reduction of 5-6db which would have been good. I do not think adding any more sound insulation makes any sense. I addressed all the key areas and anything incremental would be simply chasing a 10% improvement by adding 90% more weight. I believe the next best thing to do would be to use thicker carpet type insulation as most OEMs. But that presents a lot of other challenges that I wasn't willing to tackle. Here are some pics Trunk plastics pulled (not the factory sound deadening was really thin and comparable to dynamat) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sound Proofing | Turfgod | Audio & Video | 18 | 08-19-2015 10:16 PM |
RE-71R experiment? | Z1NONLY | Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip | 37 | 07-10-2015 02:36 AM |
Houston sound proofing | diala4asian | Texas | 1 | 08-22-2014 02:41 PM |
Need someone to do this experiment | RiCharlie | Photography | 16 | 08-20-2013 10:50 AM |
Sound Proofing | Figtuna | Audio & Video | 29 | 12-03-2011 04:02 PM |