NA: 342/275. Anyone higher?

cv129 · 11-02-2012, 09:27 PM

Subscribed!!!!!!

threeseventy · 11-02-2012, 10:27 PM

Interesting, any chance we can see a recent baseline on this particular Dynojet with a stock Z?

jpritche · 11-03-2012, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threeseventy

Interesting, any chance we can see a recent baseline on this particular Dynojet with a stock Z?

**I am not 100% sure, more like 95% lol*** but a few weeks back, we had a big dyno day at Z1 and if I remember correctly a 2012 stock made 280whp. Rob or Jon can chime in or I can ask the owner tomorrow when I see him. Either way it was in the low 280's for a stock baseline.

John@Z1 · 11-03-2012, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpritche

**I am not 100% sure, more like 95% lol*** but a few weeks back, we had a big dyno day at Z1 and if I remember correctly a 2012 stock made 280whp. Rob or Jon can chime in or I can ask the owner tomorrow when I see him. Either way it was in the low 280's for a stock baseline.

That's about right. We've also had them dyno as low 273rwhp.

ChrisSlicks · 11-03-2012, 09:46 AM

Was a 1.0 correction factor used for all pulls?

If so, impressive gains through the entire RPM range.

John@Z1 · 11-03-2012, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks

Was a 1.0 correction factor used for all pulls?

If so, impressive gains through the entire RPM range.

The same correction factor is used on every vehicle we dyno.

Megan370z · 11-03-2012, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpritche

**I am not 100% sure, more like 95% lol*** but a few weeks back, we had a big dyno day at Z1 and if I remember correctly a 2012 stock made 280whp. Rob or Jon can chime in or I can ask the owner tomorrow when I see him. Either way it was in the low 280's for a stock baseline.

so if a stock 2012 was in the 28x whp
that mean this 342whp isnt too exeptional afterall...
I went from 256 to 324 without VVEL tuning which is 68whp more and let assume Mike had exactly 280whp as a baseline.. he got +62whp up to 342whp
the biggest difference between him and my setup is the oversized TB other than that the rest is pretty similar.

John@Z1 · 11-03-2012, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megan370z

so if a stock 2012 was in the 28x whp
that mean this 342whp isnt too exeptional afterall...
I went from 256 to 324 without VVEL tuning which is 68whp more and let assume Mike had exactly 280whp as a baseline.. he got +62whp up to 342whp
the biggest difference between him and my setup is the oversized TB other than that the rest is pretty similar.

We have never dynoed a 370Z that only makes 256rwhp. That's 350Z HR power. What dyno was used? And believe me there is more than oversized TB which Mike doesn't have.

Megan370z · 11-03-2012, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John@Z1

We have never dynoed a 370Z that only makes 256rwhp. That's 350Z HR power. What dyno was used? And believe me there is more than oversized TB which Mike doesn't have.

that 256whp was done on a dynopack which is on part with other 370z.
vq35de were about 215 on that dyno where I used to go. (sg-motorsport.com)
anyway

I was just comparing the gain from both dyno.
the end result isnt as great as they look to be ,,
im not bashing anyone here.

the big point I was showing up is only the gain on each dyno , not comparing a dyno to a different dyno which cant be the same.

John@Z1 · 11-03-2012, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megan370z

that 256whp was done on a dynopack which is on part with other 370z.
vq35de were about 215 on that dyno where I used to go. (sg-motorsport.com)
anyway

I was just comparing the gain from both dyno.
the end result isnt as great as they look to be ,,
im not bashing anyone here.

the big point I was showing up is only the gain on each dyno , not comparing a dyno to a different dyno which cant be the same.

Still to many variables was this 256 run the absolute first run?

indyn · 11-05-2012, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megan370z

so if a stock 2012 was in the 28x whp
that mean this 342whp isnt too exeptional afterall...
I went from 256 to 324 without VVEL tuning which is 68whp more and let assume Mike had exactly 280whp as a baseline.. he got +62whp up to 342whp
the biggest difference between him and my setup is the oversized TB other than that the rest is pretty similar.

Megan is right, typical average gains are in the 50 - 60+ whp across the board with the typical mods Gen3, ART/LTH and CBE. This is without touching the VVEL.

daisuke149 · 11-05-2012, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by indyn

Megan is right, typical average gains are in the 50 - 60+ whp across the board with the typical mods Gen3, ART/LTH and CBE. This is without touching the VVEL.

gtypical gains for those mods are not 50-60whp... LOLOL where are you even getting that.

find the examples you speak of.

indyn · 11-05-2012, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daisuke149

gtypical gains for those mods are not 50-60whp... LOLOL where are you even getting that.

find the examples you speak of.

look up Megan's profile, and anyone else running the long tube headers, Gen 3 and CBE with a tune.

Red__Zed · 11-05-2012, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megan370z

so if a stock 2012 was in the 28x whp
that mean this 342whp isnt too exeptional afterall...
I went from 256 to 324 without VVEL tuning which is 68whp more and let assume Mike had exactly 280whp as a baseline.. he got +62whp up to 342whp
the biggest difference between him and my setup is the oversized TB other than that the rest is pretty similar.

It's worth it to take some advice I heard once from a very wise man about how to compare dyno numbers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Don't.

But if you must, account for some of the potential differences...by watching percentages.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

PP numbers are more telling. 10whp over a 200whp baseline is 5PP, over a 300whp baseline it is 3.33...pp. basically takes the inflationary nature of dyno out, which does a lot to level the numbers.

If, for instance, we choose to compare mike's gains to yours, say...

(342-280)/280~= 22.1% gain

(324-256)/256~= 26.6% gain

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordo!

I don't know where Mike is, but your numbers are severely negatively affected by power and elevation, even with very high CF's.

At sea level in FL, where I am, the summer heat and humidity will absolutely kill power, no matter how much correction is used.

The SAE guys need to develop better corrections for their estimates...

And this is why I'm always loathe to compare numbers.

11-02-2012, 10:27 PM	#2 (permalink)
threeseventy Track Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Huntington Beach, CA Posts: 600 Drives: Opinion Rep Power: 16	Interesting, any chance we can see a recent baseline on this particular Dynojet with a stock Z? 370ZNISMO#704 likes this.

11-03-2012, 09:46 AM	#5 (permalink)
ChrisSlicks A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: North East Posts: 6,203 Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6 Rep Power: 654	Was a 1.0 correction factor used for all pulls? If so, impressive gains through the entire RPM range. __________________ Hotchkis ARB \| Stillen CAI \| Art Pipes \| Berk CBE \| Stillen AP Racing Brakes \| AE Performance Oil Cooler \| BC Racing ER Coilovers \| Doran Control Arms

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New Exhaust higher oil pressure gauge????	jlbrenne	Engine & Drivetrain	10	08-26-2012 09:23 PM
catback exhaust and higher oil temp	wasti	Intake/Exhaust	23	06-27-2011 04:32 PM
Higher Oil Temp after oil Change???	BLM	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	27	04-05-2011 07:47 PM
Higher gear ratios	Zeto	Engine & Drivetrain	8	07-09-2010 08:37 AM
Any 370s running higher than 20psi?	GoDZiLLa_845	Forced Induction	68	04-16-2010 11:31 PM

11-02-2012, 09:27 PM	#1 (permalink)
cv129 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 3,263 Drives: 09 Nismo, 16 Nismo Rep Power: 163995	Subscribed!!!!!!