08-30-2011, 12:00 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,393
Drives: 11 370 6mt pw w/sp
Rep Power: 16
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYBladeZ
The old Evo motors were cast iron thats why there were reliable. The new ones are aluminum. I loved the old Evos but by the time I was in the market they just weren't appealing. Besides the Z looks better and I prefer an RWD any day. TT or SC a Z and the Evos and Sti's without built blocks are left behind.
|
The 4b11 has shown thus far to be quite a reliable motor from what I have seen on the Evo forums, and I spent a lot of time on there. The old 4g63 was proven over and over and over for 9 generations and obviously in some of the older Eclipse's as well, so yes I would say it was more reliable, both are strong motors though. The power trains in the Z seem quite solid though and I have read no complaints on any area of them which makes me happy. I'll be putting my trusty AMSoil MTF in my Z soon too 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
