Nissan 370Z Forum  

oil changes...

Originally Posted by VCuomo Well, not really. According to an inflaction calculator "What cost $4300 in 1970 would cost $23494.85 in 2009.". If you include the air conditioning in the

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2010, 12:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
FERRARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 324
Drives: PERFECTION
Rep Power: 493
FERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to FERRARI
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VCuomo View Post
Well, not really. According to an inflaction calculator "What cost $4300 in 1970 would cost $23494.85 in 2009.". If you include the air conditioning in the price, then "What cost $4799 in 1970 would cost $26221.34 in 2009.".
A vette fully loaded was $8,500.00 (Big Block too) and gas was under 30 cents a gallon........and Minimum wage was around $1.85 an hour...

Did you mean "inflation" ?

Last edited by FERRARI; 10-20-2010 at 12:28 PM. Reason: add
FERRARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 12:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 887
Drives: BMW 335i Sport
Rep Power: 17
VCuomo will become famous soon enoughVCuomo will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FERRARI View Post
A vette fully loaded was $8,500.00 (Big Block too) and gas was under 30 cents a gallon........and Minimum wage was around $1.85 an hour...

Did you mean "inflation" ?
Yep, my bad.

According to the same inflation calculator:
"What cost $8500 in 1970 would cost $46443.30 in 2009."
"What cost $.28 in 1970 would cost $1.53 in 2009."
"What cost $1.85 in 1970 would cost $10.11 in 2009."
So Vettes, gas, and minimum wage are a worse deal today than in 1970.
VCuomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 12:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
FERRARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 324
Drives: PERFECTION
Rep Power: 493
FERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to FERRARI
Default

Well...the vette I am talking about would compair to the ZR1 and they are about 100 grand...arent they ?
FERRARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 12:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 887
Drives: BMW 335i Sport
Rep Power: 17
VCuomo will become famous soon enoughVCuomo will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FERRARI View Post
Well...the vette I am talking about would compair to the ZR1 and they are about 100 grand...arent they ?
That's what I mean - it's a worse deal today (the ZR1 should cost $46K). Although the technology in the ZR1 (aluminum frame, racing engine technology) is much better today compared to the old days where they pretty much just stuffed more displacement under the hood (and yeah, I know they also sometimes put in aluminum heads too, but basically the diff between a "base" vette and the hotter models was a larger engine).
VCuomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 03:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
FERRARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 324
Drives: PERFECTION
Rep Power: 493
FERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond reputeFERRARI has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to FERRARI
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VCuomo View Post
That's what I mean - it's a worse deal today (the ZR1 should cost $46K). Although the technology in the ZR1 (aluminum frame, racing engine technology) is much better today compared to the old days where they pretty much just stuffed more displacement under the hood (and yeah, I know they also sometimes put in aluminum heads too, but basically the diff between a "base" vette and the hotter models was a larger engine).


NOW....if they would only do the big block with all of the modern technology........sweet.......that would be what a lot of guys here are looking for.........but the L88 and L89 engines were something else.......!!! and with the stock side pipes and two dual feed Holley's like I had on my 67(stock) ....you would not believe how good it sounded......they came with stock cast iron headers........only problem ....every time I drove from Tennessee to Miami, I couldnt hear for two days....!! big problem when you are in training camp and can not hear the plays being called....lol BTW...the window of that 1967 427 with everything you could get on it was $6,900.00
you could not get Air Conditioning.....not offered because of overheating
FERRARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 06:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 887
Drives: BMW 335i Sport
Rep Power: 17
VCuomo will become famous soon enoughVCuomo will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FERRARI View Post


NOW....if they would only do the big block with all of the modern technology........sweet.......that would be what a lot of guys here are looking for.........
Wouldn't that be the LS3 (currently used in the Corvette and Camaro SS, 376 cu. in.), at least as far as performance goes. I guess the LS7 (427 cu. in.) comes closest to being a modern day version of the old BB.

BTW, these days I have a 1972 Corvette coupe with a 383 - fun car:




Last edited by VCuomo; 10-20-2010 at 06:39 PM.
VCuomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2