Nissan 370Z Forum  

out with limiters!

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang The AT is faster than the SRT-4, which is the fastest car in the world. SHUT UP!!!! Really???? Damn Z's

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2010, 09:16 AM   #16 (permalink)
Base Member
 
ROC1ROB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 201
Drives: 09 MT BS Base/Sports
Rep Power: 15
ROC1ROB is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang View Post
The AT is faster than the SRT-4, which is the fastest car in the world.
SHUT UP!!!! Really???? Damn Z's
ROC1ROB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 10:44 AM   #17 (permalink)
RCZ
A True Z Fanatic
 
RCZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 6,403
Drives: '09 370Z
Rep Power: 1119
RCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond reputeRCZ has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to RCZ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang View Post
The AT is faster than the SRT-4, which is the fastest car in the world.
This is not true. The SRT-4 is ECU limited to 185999 miles per second, thats one mile per second less than the speed of light. Dodge engineers were concerned that if the SRT-4 went any faster (which it easily could in 4th, I believe) its mass would become infinite and would rip a hole in spacetime, creating a singularity that would end mankind's existence as we know it.

I hear they are using repo'd SRT-4 engines at CERN...but they are still on low boost.
RCZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 10:47 AM   #18 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
m4a1mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 55,385
Drives: on two wheels
Rep Power: 6962
m4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Indeed. The story line of the up and coming "24" movie has Jack Bauer chasing a terrorist cell that has gained control of an SRT-4 ECU tuner. If he doesn't catch them in time, they will remove the speed limiter and destroy the universe as we know it.
__________________
- Steve
MAZOC Meet Thread
Zs & Coffee - Saturdays at 10AM in Fairfax, VA and Columbia, MD (Click the banner!)
LIKE us on Facebook!
m4a1mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 04:59 PM   #19 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 887
Drives: BMW 335i Sport
Rep Power: 17
VCuomo will become famous soon enoughVCuomo will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by >135I View Post
Well according to past post the vdc even though turned off, is still actually running at about 10%. I have went through the trouble of pulling up the center console and unplugging the module itself. That way you can be sure it's 100% off. My car has been like this for about 4 months with no issues.
You're the first guy I've heard of who's done this. Does the car feel different with the module unplugged than when you just turned off the VDC with the switch?
VCuomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2010, 02:13 AM   #20 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NE
Age: 39
Posts: 649
Drives: cars
Rep Power: 17
Push370zzz is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chii370 View Post
Has anyone came up with a way to turn off this cars limiters that don't cost 550+ dollars from the get go? I personally believe that if you sell a sports car like this that anyone that even speaks the word "limiter" in the development phase should be immediately executed on the spot that being said there are only 2 on the car that concern me, i couldnt care less about the rev limiter as it actually aids against stupid people blowing up the engine. But the top speed limiter (155mph) and the WOT control (wide open throttle/0-60 acceleration limiter) are a complete waste on a genuine sports car.....

I can understand maybe putting these on the base or touring models, but i have a nismo for Christs sake!! lol thats like going to Iraq, getting an M16 handed to you and saying "you know what? i only want 5 rounds in each of my clips" then proceeding to take out the other 25 in each clip and throw them away.

If anyone knows or has particular skill in reprogramming these cars w/o the aid of a crazy fat wallet it would be most helpful..... and im sure im not the only one frustrated with it :P
You have to understand that the vehicle's stock tires can only withstand 165 mph, so the engineers utilize what is called a factor of safety to keep stupid people with no sense of their vehicle's component's capabilities alive.

If you want to go faster than 155mph, pay to have it removed and upgrade your tires...
__________________
Range Rover Sport Supercharged
Nissan 370z Touring + Sport
Push370zzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2010, 02:52 AM   #21 (permalink)
Track Member
 
chii370's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: .
Posts: 642
Drives: .
Rep Power: 16
chii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to beholdchii370 is a splendid one to behold
Default

lol i have Bridgestone Potenza RE050A and there rated "Y" which is 186mph which is probably a little faster then the Z is AERODYNAMICALLY limited too, but then.... no one knows b/c the only ones that have tampered with the limiter have also usually super or turbo charged the car... thus ruining any chance of seeing what it can do naturally aspirated. Dont get me wrong... im putting a stillin super charger on it later this year, but arent you curious even just a bit? I mean your paying for it right? why not get the full experience.
chii370 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2010, 09:34 AM   #22 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NE
Age: 39
Posts: 649
Drives: cars
Rep Power: 17
Push370zzz is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chii370 View Post
lol i have Bridgestone Potenza RE050A and there rated "Y" which is 186mph which is probably a little faster then the Z is AERODYNAMICALLY limited too, but then.... no one knows b/c the only ones that have tampered with the limiter have also usually super or turbo charged the car... thus ruining any chance of seeing what it can do naturally aspirated. Dont get me wrong... im putting a stillin super charger on it later this year, but arent you curious even just a bit? I mean your paying for it right? why not get the full experience.
Sounds like you have the sport package. The base model only has a W rating as far as I know, which is only good to 168 mph...
__________________
Range Rover Sport Supercharged
Nissan 370z Touring + Sport
Push370zzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2010, 11:14 AM   #23 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 453
Drives: 2009 Nissan 370z
Rep Power: 16
Solus will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by >135I View Post
Well according to past post the vdc even though turned off, is still actually running at about 10%. I have went through the trouble of pulling up the center console and unplugging the module itself. That way you can be sure it's 100% off. My car has been like this for about 4 months with no issues.
I had been wondering where that was and if it could be unplugged because i hate turning it off.
Solus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2010, 12:48 PM   #24 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Mr&Mrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,207
Drives: RZ34
Rep Power: 31940
Mr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond reputeMr&Mrs has a reputation beyond repute
Default

So much hate for the SRT-4? I love mine, I just wish people would not have given these impressions to so many!
Mr&Mrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2010, 01:04 PM   #25 (permalink)
Base Member
 
jpmotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 243
Drives: BNR 16G'd Legacy GT
Rep Power: 15
jpmotor is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to jpmotor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCZ View Post
This is not true. The SRT-4 is ECU limited to 185999 miles per second, thats one mile per second less than the speed of light. Dodge engineers were concerned that if the SRT-4 went any faster (which it easily could in 4th, I believe) its mass would become infinite and would rip a hole in spacetime, creating a singularity that would end mankind's existence as we know it.

I hear they are using repo'd SRT-4 engines at CERN...but they are still on low boost.
damnn...I'd love to see that happen!
jpmotor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2