Originally Posted by 2theextreme Not adding any fuel but......I have everything installed in my sig....and yes that includes a fully tuned Cobb AccessPORT and only get this: Granted I used
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2009, 05:58 PM | #106 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Double Oak Tx
Posts: 255
Drives: 370Z, 96CE hotrod
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
If you would like, more than willing to share my tuning/log files and your welcome to them as none are available from Cobb. Just remember each car is different, probably different gas, different weather, etc. and it will still need to be tweaked on an individual basis. More data points however to mull over. I'd like to see a database of members tunes to get a better overall prospective as I've found the car to be somewhat difficult to tune and the software a bit flaky. Certainly something to be gained by collective intelligence. SAE the car made 323 rwhp which still isn't something to jump up and down about, but it's obvious the car has timing issues and may come around a tad more after getting a better handle on the car and more software refinement. On a tangent...guys, that's better than a stock LS1. Think about it!! |
|
10-12-2009, 09:26 PM | #108 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 685
Drives: 06 Porsche Carrera S
Rep Power: 18 |
interesting numbers. I'm surprised more so the difference between the two nismo cars. Also with less than 2000 miles on that motor I'm surprised it was more powerful than other higher mileage 370Zs.
__________________
Check out my Albums '13 Subaru WRX STi | '06 Porsche 911 Carrera S (SOLD) | '96 Mazda RX-7 6.0L V8 RHD (SOLD) | '09 Nissan Nismo #0058 (SOLD) |
10-12-2009, 11:32 PM | #109 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 115
Drives: Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I find it so funny that people who needed a "nice, long explanation about how I made no sense", specially those who claimed to have "balls" to flame me all of a sudden quiet, and haven't asked you a single question in regards to your post, ignoring your post... I guess its a shrinkage problem Would be nice to hear from experts from this forum, on what they think about this particular Mustang Dyno @ Performance Motorsport. Cause i thought it was the most accurate Dyno on the market? No? If not, what other dynos would be recommended to go and get my car baselined on? Last edited by Nismo_370; 10-12-2009 at 11:34 PM. |
|
10-12-2009, 11:35 PM | #110 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
"Most accurate" will be 100% bias answer really.
Engine logics in Houston swears by their Dyno Dynamics as been the most accurate, where other shops you Dyno Jet. I believe Uprev in Austin uses Dyno Jet to do their tuning on, so in the end it really only matters for a base v. upgrade. Really what the dyno is about is seeing your car progress, you want to find a good shop, with a solid dyno, giving accurate numbers consistently which you can use throughout the time you upgrade your car. This way you can track your car and know if there are any problems, issues, etc. by adding X part.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
10-12-2009, 11:53 PM | #111 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 115
Drives: Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I mean... yourself and other few people in the thread, have their whp noted in their signature. Is it 100% accurate?, probably not(as i learned today), yet people don't really say anything negative about it... I am really confused now! How do you find a solid dyno, giving accurate numbers consistently? Does anyone know what is exact powerloss % due to drivetrain etc on stock 370z? Last edited by Nismo_370; 10-13-2009 at 12:03 AM. |
|
10-13-2009, 12:08 AM | #112 (permalink) |
RIP Tony :( (1969-2015)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 18,802
Drives: '14 Mustang GT/CS
Rep Power: 67 |
Not that this will solve or answer anything but here are my dyno results (prior to the Cobb AccessPORT) back in August. The first one was done 7 August @ Altered Atmosphere using their DynoJet:
Now, just for sh*ts & giggles I had a dyno performed on 22 August on a DynoDynamics (aka "The Heartbreaker"): No changes were made to my car between the two results.....quite a difference, huh?
__________________
SpinTech Mufflers, Airaid CAI, JBA H-Pipe, Lethal Performance Over Axle Pipes, MMD Quarter Panel Louvers, Cervini's Ram Air Type IV Hood, Carbon Fiber Radiator Cover, GT500 Rear Valance, Quad Exhaust Tips
|
10-13-2009, 12:09 AM | #113 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 293
Drives: 2009 370z 6MT
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Instead of calling people "haters", just listen to what they have to say, you'll get farther in life. |
|
10-13-2009, 12:11 AM | #114 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Queens NY
Posts: 246
Drives: 09 Niss 370Z Blue A7
Rep Power: 16 |
Rob, i think you bring up a good point. Why does your 330 get flamed, but other WHPs on peoples signatures not call any attention. From what it seem (by the admission of many of the flamers) dynos cant really be used to give an absolute WHP. Its main use is to calculate WHP deltas. So your 330 in your sig is just as credible as somone's 2xx.
|
10-13-2009, 12:14 AM | #115 (permalink) | ||
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 115
Drives: Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
It may have something to do with the fact that they have spent lots of money to get to 330... and its upseting to see stock nismo show that number?... but then again... i wouldn't know anything about it... I think i gotta go and DYNO my car at "heartbreaker" to please everyone :P Why do i get a feeling that, base 370z owners are separating themself from Nismo owners? I mean overall its same car! Except few badges, suspension, ecu, exhaust, cosmetics, interior, weight & body reinforcements... Quote:
I listen to people who get their point across without offending me for no reason! Last edited by Nismo_370; 10-13-2009 at 12:35 AM. |
||
10-13-2009, 12:32 AM | #117 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,613
Drives: Nothing Now!
Rep Power: 224 |
Quote:
You are SOOO correct about the MT test being Apples and oranges... That is one reason why I did not renew my MT subscription.... |
|
10-13-2009, 12:32 AM | #118 (permalink) |
RIP Tony :( (1969-2015)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 18,802
Drives: '14 Mustang GT/CS
Rep Power: 67 |
I just posted my two different ones just to show how different they can come out. I think its great that you got 330! 14K in upgrades for me and I'm still 15 whp behind ya.
__________________
SpinTech Mufflers, Airaid CAI, JBA H-Pipe, Lethal Performance Over Axle Pipes, MMD Quarter Panel Louvers, Cervini's Ram Air Type IV Hood, Carbon Fiber Radiator Cover, GT500 Rear Valance, Quad Exhaust Tips
|
10-13-2009, 12:38 AM | #119 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 115
Drives: Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Just wait until i break my motor in properly hahahahahahaha..... i don't think i will leave another day after those results |
|
10-13-2009, 12:47 AM | #120 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Some of us work you know?
Not posting for hours isnt going quiet, its being busy. I am not ignoring either one of your posts. You really want to get me going though right? Shrinkage problem? Listen, as easily as I could run you and this thread into the ground, I'm not going to because I know this all stems from you having more ego than you do experience on modding cars. You seem to be missing the point still though so let me play nice again. Dynos are only as good as their ability to be consistent and give you a comparison by which to judge the efficiency of your engine and transmission. As in the actual numbers you produce vary from dyno to dyno because they are calibrated differently or just because they are in different shape from another dyno. Whats important is your ability to consistently figure out how much of a difference your modifications have made. That is all true, but only within reason. If your car came out to 450whp (or 330 for that matter) five dyno pulls in a row, it doesn't make that dyno graph real. There has to be SOME continuity between dynos, don't you think? As in, well calibrated mustangdyne dynos should come out with relatively similar numbers, affected only by such things as wear, atmospheric conditions and the actual car (as some cars have more hp than others of the same car stock). You made a comment about the veridity of my numbers? Let me explain to you that I started off with 256whp on a mustangdyne dyno. After doing similar bolt on mods than a lot of people did on this forums, I got very similar numbers (in fact somewhat lower) than they did on the same dynos in different places throughout the country. Also, I've got a little experience when it comes to cars. I know what 330whp feels like with a 3000lb car, a 3300lb car and a 3600lb car. I know I am a little under that for my car and so my numbers make sense for where I'm at. Go figure I can go a little faster than an e92 M3 on the straights at my local track.. So the point is, there has to be some continuity to the results. 330whp is something like 23% too high for your car on that dyno based on the consensus we've had since I joined this board. Just because the dyno says its true, it doesn't mean its true. Always take your results with a grain of salt. If you read my journal you will see that I was one of the first people who posted results for full bolt ons and that I was in disbelief about the results and the numbers I got. But then others with similar mods started making the same power on the same dyno's and it seems now that a full bolt on 370z is making around 310rwhp. After seeing tons of 370Z's dyno on these forums, those of us who have been paying attention have been able to estimate the range of where stock cars fall for different dynos and where the different mods done to them fall on different dynos. After seeing the effects of different mods, we have also come to predict results for new mods that come out. Obviously its a new car and there are a lot of unknowns to us so far, but we know certain things already. So you see the problem with coming in here and telling us you have 330whp on your stock Nismo and then arguing with us when we tell you that you don't. Do you see why its a little frustrating and some have even tried showing you you dont have 330whp using your quarter mile trap speed? You make it seem like we are out on a crusade to shut you down and put you down when that is far from the case. We just hate to see someone bust in here thinking they know something we know isn't true and then arguing with us when we tell you its not true. If you want to live in dreamland and claim you have 300whp+ and look like a complete idiot, then be my guest. It just seems it would've been a little easier to listen to us. Also you are going to have to get used to a little hazing, specially when you are new to the forum and when you are making wild claims that anyone with some experience know not to be true. Trust me that becomes apparent very quickly to those with more experience when someone else doesn't really have a full grasp of things yet. As far as the accuracy of mustangs...they are excellent dyno's because they are consistent and accurate for comparing runs when you are doing tuning or have installed add-ons. They read lower than most other dynos, with the exception of the dyno dynamics sometimes. (which is another reason your numbers are silly). If you really have 330whp on a mustangdyne, then you should get something like 380whp on a dynapak....haha that would be nice for a stock 332bhp car..... We might be a little rough at times, but we mean well. So instead of a fight, you get more info you ***. EDIT: I just read your previous posts while I was writing mine and you are a clueless jackass. Last edited by RCZ; 10-13-2009 at 12:51 AM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z tech specs revealed! | localmike | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 24 | 08-01-2012 08:23 PM |
2009 Nissan 370Z Australian Specs PDF manual | 370er | Nissan 370Z Owners Manual / Service Manuals | 8 | 12-12-2010 10:16 PM |
Disappointing Nismo 370Z Specs? | zman1910 | Nismo 370Z | 27 | 09-13-2010 10:05 AM |
Nismo 370z specs | ishthemienguy | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 0 | 08-12-2009 02:12 PM |
Nissan 370z specs rumor/specualations | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 3 | 11-10-2008 06:39 PM |