Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Engine & Drivetrain (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/)
-   -   NISMO 370z DYNO SPECS (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/10007-nismo-370z-dyno-specs.html)

theDreamer 10-11-2009 09:15 PM

The row with the hole is probably your 60ft.

import111 10-11-2009 09:17 PM

Now you are just a liar. You stated above that, "Non-Nismo 370Z with bolt on's (intake, exhaust, & test pipes) ran lower HP, than stock Nismo.", but the #'s you just posted say that the modded non Nismo made 1whp more than you.

Also you kept saying you made 330whp, which is still in you Sig, but the #'s you just posted are 327whp. Looks like you are twisting your own words.

Valentino 10-11-2009 09:19 PM

So no mojo's in the Nismo ECU ... :shakes head:

For the OP .. we live and learn .. Most who disagreed, Or who agreed with your numbers assumed that you knew all about the difference in dyno manufactures and SAE numbers.

PEACE

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by import111 (Post 232733)
Now you are just a liar. You stated above that, "Non-Nismo 370Z with bolt on's (intake, exhaust, & test pipes) ran lower HP, than stock Nismo.", but the #'s you just posted say that the modded non Nismo made 1whp more than you.

Also you kept saying you made 330whp, which is still in you Sig, but the #'s you just posted are 327whp. Looks like you are twisting your own words.

oh god... ok i stand corrected... my stock Nismo made 1 HP less than modified base 370z. I was corrected earlier by someone who explained what was "corrected HP on the dyno"
My uncorrected Dyno run was 330 HP... my corrected Dyno run was 327 HP...

370Zsteve 10-11-2009 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo_370 (Post 232614)
So those who still have need to continue to flame me... flame on!!!

:thumbsdown: Change your sig it makes you look silly. Demand another pull on their dyno, tell them everyone is laughing at you and you are getting a bit testy about it. :tup:

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370Zsteve (Post 232743)
:thumbsdown: Change your sig it makes you look silly.

Done

fairladyZ34 10-11-2009 09:34 PM

its funny when people bash others on the internet cuz they never have to say it to that person face to face.

the 327whp does seem a bit high tho. that would make an extremely effiecient drivetrain with about a 6.6% drivetrain loss

theDreamer 10-11-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ34 (Post 232762)
its funny when people bash others on the internet cuz they never have to say it to that person face to face.

the 327whp does seem a bit high tho. that would make an extremely effiecient drivetrain with about a 6.6% drivetrain loss

I could bet many of the people here would say something similar to what they are saying now. They might not be so blunt, but they would let them know something is wrong or the dyno needs calibration.

dcrew1x 10-11-2009 09:37 PM

Relax man.

Don't get upset over this; this is the internet.

First off, thanks for posting your dyno results.

It wouldn't hurt to ask the dude to do another dyno run but if you don't want to it's not the end of the world and nobody is going to hate you for it.

If you can, for your own personal benefit/information, try getting a baseline somewhere else? At the very least for your own peace of mind. No one is forcing anything.

For now, consider the fact that your dyno is not "accurate" and leave it at that.

You'll be happier in the long run.

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ34 (Post 232762)
its funny when people bash others on the internet cuz they never have to say it to that person face to face.

the 327whp does seem a bit high tho. that would make an extremely effiecient drivetrain with about a 6.6% drivetrain loss

I agree to both statements!

Mike 10-11-2009 09:39 PM

The numbers may be high, but that still doesn't negate the fact that the 2 nismos made considerably more than the regular ones that were modded, except that one that was close. That tells me you really need some ecu recalibration to take full advantage of bolt ons.

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcrew1x (Post 232765)
Relax man.

Don't get upset over this; this is the internet.

First off, thanks for posting your dyno results.

It wouldn't hurt to ask the dude to do another dyno run but if you don't want to it's not the end of the world and nobody is going to hate you for it.

If you can, for your own personal benefit/information, try getting a baseline somewhere else? At the very least for your own peace of mind. No one is forcing anything.

For now, consider the fact that your dyno is not "accurate" and leave it at that.

You'll be happier in the long run.


Yep, thanks man!
Apreciate it!

I actually stated already, that I will be doing another DYNO Run elsewhere.
When i do, I will post numbers!

I will let Performance Motorsport know, that they might need to collaborate their DYNO.

But again, it was a DYNO day of all 370z, so relatively comparing my runs to other Zs. I am a happy man, seeing that i didn't pay extra money for the Nismo, just because of looks.

fairladyZ34 10-11-2009 09:44 PM

it is what it is. the nismos run a higher air/fuel ratio than non-nismos. so i bet by default if you were to mod a reg-z and nismo-z with the same boltons the nismo would make more power because it can use the increases airflow

Nismo_370 10-11-2009 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 232768)
The numbers may be high, but that still doesn't negate the fact that the 2 nismos made considerably more than the regular ones that were modded, except that one that was close. That tells me you really need some ecu recalibration to take full advantage of bolt ons.

THANK YOU! For pointing it out.

JoeD 10-11-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo_370 (Post 232726)

R/T: .618
I made a whole in whatever is the next row data is, but it showing: 2.263
33x: 5.999
1/8: 9.081
MPH: 78.82
1000:11.654
1/4: 13.868
MPH: 102.16

Thanks for the info. :tup:

Your 102 MPH speaks volumes. Unfortunately, you can't excuse poor driving or track-prep for an unsatisfactory trap-speed, as it is a parameter not significantly effected. To delve a little deeper, your 23.3 MPH delta between the 660' and 1320' solidifies you car as being slower-than-average.

Look like your 330 horses making it to the wheels aren't working as hard as the 275 or so in a stock Base-model.

We've seen bone stock 7ATs go 13.2 @ 108 MPH. Damn...they must make upwards of 375 RWHP. :roflpuke2:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2