Nissan 370Z Forum  

D2 Coilovers

Originally Posted by Jhill Here mays maybe this will help you. As I said people used to always comment on how ti springs felt different/better than steel and often commented

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Brakes & Suspension


Like Tree44Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2017, 11:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 32
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 36
MaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhill View Post
Here mays maybe this will help you. As I said people used to always comment on how ti springs felt different/better than steel and often commented as being "plusher".
Good info, and also good point about it being plusher oppose to softer. That i believe is the correct term. But this doesn't explain how it changes its specific force output when comparing two similarly rated springs. It only explains for any specific rate, you have less mass and subsequently more available travel. Would this actually make 400ib/in rated spring respond differently? Possibly, but what is being changed here dynamically? Wheel rate? The springs mass is balanced 50/50 between unsprung and sprung mass, so 2-5ibs loss in mass on the unsprung side would make a huge difference on its inertia over bumps. The other caveat is fatigue resistance and resistance to sag. Both of these go back to what i said earlier.

Quote:
Regards to new versus old. It's also possible you guys felt a difference simply because the old spring has settled into fatigue and spring sag, loosing it's original overall force output over time
So in actuality the new spring would actually be stiffer, possibly resulting in a smoother more responsive wheel control. This intern is misconceived as "softer", but as you pointed out, it is actually "plusher".

Similarly to reducing the mass by adding smaller diameter and lighter wheels and tires, the overall change here is a reduction in weight and inertia.
MaysEffect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 11:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San jose
Posts: 854
Drives: 2013 370z sport
Rep Power: 3385
Jhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaysEffect View Post
Good info, and also good point about it being plusher oppose to softer. That i believe is the correct term. But this doesn't explain how it changes its specific force output when comparing two similarly rated springs. It only explains for any specific rate, you have less mass and subsequently more available travel. Would this actually make 400ib/in rated spring respond differently? Possibly, but what is being changed here dynamically? Wheel rate? The springs mass is balanced 50/50 between unsprung and sprung mass, so 2-5ibs loss in mass on the unsprung side would make a huge difference on its inertia over bumps. The other caveat is fatigue resistance and resistance to sag. Both of these go back to what i said earlier.



So in actuality the new spring would actually be stiffer, possibly resulting in a smoother more responsive wheel control. This intern is misconceived as "softer", but as you pointed out, it is actually "plusher".

Similarly to reducing the mass by adding smaller diameter and lighter wheels and tires, the overall change here is a reduction in weight and inertia.
I don't think there is a difference in force output andI don't believe anyone here is actually thinking that. I believe this whole thing got derailed because of nitpicking terminology. I don't believe anyone is actually claiming swifts are "softer" what they mean is they ride more sensitive and give a perceived "softer" or probably more appropriately named "plusher" ride. This allows a user to jump up one rate without having the added "harshness" when doing so.

As you stated yes they will have less unsprung mass (although I'm not actually sure if that's right, is 50% the spring considered unsprung?) allowing the suspension to react quicker and just like wheels/rotors and everything else which all drastically help suspension.

As for an old vs new spring the spring on my bike was only one season old and had about 1-2 turns of preload (which in less than 1/16 and in on this shock) and unlike a vehicle there is no load on them without a rider (the rider is the main mass) so as for it being fatigued after only one season and being my dedicated dh bike it only sees about 6-8 trips a season so I highly doubt it was fatigued when I changed to the alloy spring.

As stated though it is a very slight difference but I'll bet the weight savings difference for this size size spring isn't as much as a car spring.
Hotrodz likes this.
Jhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 12:17 AM   #3 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 32
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 36
MaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond repute
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhill View Post
...I believe this whole thing got derailed because of nitpicking terminology. I don't believe anyone is actually claiming swifts are "softer" what they mean is they ride more sensitive and give a perceived "softer" or probably more appropriately named "plusher" ride. - I'm 100% nitpicking

(although I'm not actually sure if that's right, is 50% the spring considered unsprung?) - It's an inaccurate estimation i'll admit, but the weight is split between both. How exact is dependent on the mounting location. It is unquestionably closer to 50/50 than 20/80 though


As for an old vs new spring the spring on my bike was only one season old and had about 1-2 turns of preload (which in less than 1/16 and in on this shock) and unlike a vehicle there is no load on them without a rider (the rider is the main mass - arguable) so as for it being fatigued after only one season and being my dedicated dh bike it only sees about 6-8 trips a season so I highly doubt it was fatigued when I changed to the alloy spring.
The last part is still very debatable. Some companies are claiming that TI alloy springs have a cycling lifetime 50% greater than chrome silicone and vanadium steel. And even 6-8 rides is a long time. Sag can set in within weeks if not days of riding. Not to mention, even brand new cars/bikes already have several thousand oscillations before you even buy it.

Also i'm still not understanding your logic on your preloading methods. But if it works i have no qualms lol
MaysEffect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 01:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San jose
Posts: 854
Drives: 2013 370z sport
Rep Power: 3385
Jhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaysEffect View Post
The last part is still very debatable. Some companies are claiming that TI alloy springs have a cycling lifetime 50% greater than chrome silicone and vanadium steel. And even 6-8 rides is a long time. Sag can set in within weeks if not days of riding. Not to mention, even brand new cars/bikes already have several thousand oscillations before you even buy it.

Also i'm still not understanding your logic on your preloading methods. But if it works i have no qualms lol
Not sure how it's arguable that the rider is the main mass when the bike weighs 36lbs and sits at zero sag without rider.
Jhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 03:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 32
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 36
MaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond reputeMaysEffect has a reputation beyond repute
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhill View Post
Not sure how it's arguable that the rider is the main mass when the bike weighs 36lbs and sits at zero sag without rider.
Thought you were talking about a motorcycle lol..wooops

That makes more sense, i thought you were talking about a motorcycle this whole time lmao.
MaysEffect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2017, 04:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 97
Drives: 09 370z BS 6MT
Rep Power: 10
BobbyLight is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhill View Post
Not sure how it's arguable that the rider is the main mass when the bike weighs 36lbs and sits at zero sag without rider.

36LBS with a coil spring? What kind of slacked out gnarliness are you riding?
BobbyLight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2017, 04:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San jose
Posts: 854
Drives: 2013 370z sport
Rep Power: 3385
Jhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond reputeJhill has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyLight View Post
36LBS with a coil spring? What kind of slacked out gnarliness are you riding?
You asking what bike? It's a 2011 Santa Cruz v10 carbon (before they had the carbon swing arm though so it weighs a little more). A large chunk is the damn dh casing tires and if it weren't for a handful of super rocky trails at northstar I could get away with a mid casing but the last time I tried I ruined the tire and then destroyed the rim. I think it's maybe less than 36 though but can't remember last time I weighed it somewhere just below 36. Other bike is the new Nomad 4 but that's air sprung so no coil spring debate on that one.
Jhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2017, 05:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 97
Drives: 09 370z BS 6MT
Rep Power: 10
BobbyLight is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhill View Post
You asking what bike? It's a 2011 Santa Cruz v10 carbon (before they had the carbon swing arm though so it weighs a little more). A large chunk is the damn dh casing tires and if it weren't for a handful of super rocky trails at northstar I could get away with a mid casing but the last time I tried I ruined the tire and then destroyed the rim. I think it's maybe less than 36 though but can't remember last time I weighed it somewhere just below 36. Other bike is the new Nomad 4 but that's air sprung so no coil spring debate on that one.

Very nice! How are you liking the new nomad? I haven't had a chance to throw a leg over a SC but I hear their quality is top notch. Never tried a coil either for that matter. I'm currently on a transition scout , its really fun for the moderate east coast stuff around me.
BobbyLight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[WTB] Coilovers or just REAR coilovers SaoSyn_z34 Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 0 07-04-2017 10:41 PM
[FOR SALE] Aragosta Type S Coilovers, Koni Coilovers, Trans Cooler, Hotchkis Sways, Stillen HFC dimsler Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 37 05-13-2014 10:34 AM
[FOR SALE] Coilovers NIZZING Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 10 08-03-2011 05:40 PM
[FOR SALE] HKS Coilovers bullitt5897 Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 11 06-19-2011 09:51 AM
great info about coilovers vs springs..i may jus save up for coilovers instead res0zsfa Brakes & Suspension 15 09-09-2010 07:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2