Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Brakes & Suspension (http://www.the370z.com/brakes-suspension/)
-   -   Is Moton also AST? (http://www.the370z.com/brakes-suspension/113726-moton-also-ast.html)

GeauxTigers1 05-08-2016 03:10 PM

Is Moton also AST?
 
Hey There All,

Been doing some searching and literally nothing comes up for "AST" keyword search, but I do get some for Moton. I'm a bit new to the suspension world other than my 09 that I had purchased used that already had BC's. Looking for an overall upgrade with the new Z. I really feel I've narrowed it down to these two:

Moton 2-Way Sport

AST 5200 Series : AST 2-Way 5200 - Nissan 370Z/Fairlady Z

But when I look on a few sites, Moton and AST are advertised the same, but will have dif sections for their shock obsorbers. So am I really comparing relatively the exact same system? Interested in who all has experience with either. The Z is not my daily, but is going to be 70% street to events and date night and such and 30% track. Nothing competition wise, but looking to have fun and learn. It seems these two are right on the cusp of racing, but still streetable. Thanks for the help everyone!

cv129 05-08-2016 05:00 PM

I think AST bought Motons a few yrs ago. From what I read before, they still contain different internals.

Fwiw, a couple of moton main guys left and created MCS, they also have 370z application.

Curious, why not also consider JRZ?

Are you ok with some downtime every 10k or so miles? Don't know the exact frequency, but periodic rebuilds are supposed to be needed with these shocks.

That comment about not being able to put 648whp down must've gotten you a bit hot haha.

cv129 05-08-2016 05:02 PM

I believe there is one existing member running a custom set of AST shocks. AST didn't have 370z application before, must've been a recent addition.

gomer_110 05-08-2016 05:06 PM

iirc they used to be separate companies but joined forces some years back.

I actually have the AST 5200's on my car with custom valving for the higher spring rates I run.

The upside is the AST's come with the upper mounts while the Moton's require you buy them separate. Also be prepared to wait, when I ordered mine I waited somewhere on the order of 6-8 weeks.

Jhill 05-11-2016 02:20 AM

My buddy has AST on his BMW m3 and they are very impressive. I am now considering some 4100series with the ddp option. First looked at KW v3 but the no spring change option and coming with progressive rates is a deal breaker for me. Then thought the BC dr series since they have swift options and are linear but their min drop of somewhere around 1-1.5 inch drop is too much for street use for me. The AST sound like everything in after. Adjustable, spring options, min drop of .5-.75. Talking with them they seem very knowledgable of the Nissan suspensions which is surprising since I've only known about them through the BMW crowd. Also something interesting is they run an 8k front with a 6k rear rate. So same as Oem front but they feel through their testing they actually get more mechanical grip through the softer 6k rear spring. With all the users on here running the softer stock rear sway kinda makes you wonder if they are on to something? Look up Chris Harris in the new Ferrari and how it softens the rear end to regain mechanical grip, of course that's a dynamic suspension so it can change on the fly.

GeauxTigers1 05-11-2016 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cv129 (Post 3476612)
I think AST bought Motons a few yrs ago. From what I read before, they still contain different internals.

Fwiw, a couple of moton main guys left and created MCS, they also have 370z application.

Curious, why not also consider JRZ?

Are you ok with some downtime every 10k or so miles? Don't know the exact frequency, but periodic rebuilds are supposed to be needed with these shocks.

That comment about not being able to put 648whp down must've gotten you a bit hot haha.

JRZ seems to be even pricer. I believe their entry level set up was somewhere in the 7500+ range. I had been reading and quite a few people on the forums said they didn't see the gains justifying the cost. These ASTs are right where I was hoping to be. Quick question though, where did you find the info on needing to rebuild the shocks? Is that bc people with this suspension are usually tracking them or do they truly need to be rebuilt that often?

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3476616)
iirc they used to be separate companies but joined forces some years back.

I actually have the AST 5200's on my car with custom valving for the higher spring rates I run.

The upside is the AST's come with the upper mounts while the Moton's require you buy them separate. Also be prepared to wait, when I ordered mine I waited somewhere on the order of 6-8 weeks.

Fantastic! I'll be sure to save you if we come up with any q's. Any recommendations when ordering? Items to pair it with, sway bars etc? I was looking at Stillen bc as mentioned below they talked about that "softer" sway. Also 6-8 weeks aint bad! Shoot anything over seas and I automatically think it'll be JDM all over again which 2 months is the minimum! LOL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhill (Post 3478008)
My buddy has AST on his BMW m3 and they are very impressive. I am now considering some 4100series with the ddp option. First looked at KW v3 but the no spring change option and coming with progressive rates is a deal breaker for me. Then thought the BC dr series since they have swift options and are linear but their min drop of somewhere around 1-1.5 inch drop is too much for street use for me. The AST sound like everything in after. Adjustable, spring options, min drop of .5-.75. Talking with them they seem very knowledgable of the Nissan suspensions which is surprising since I've only known about them through the BMW crowd. Also something interesting is they run an 8k front with a 6k rear rate. So same as Oem front but they feel through their testing they actually get more mechanical grip through the softer 6k rear spring. With all the users on here running the softer stock rear sway kinda makes you wonder if they are on to something? Look up Chris Harris in the new Ferrari and how it softens the rear end to regain mechanical grip, of course that's a dynamic suspension so it can change on the fly.

Thanks for the great detail! Repped. The min drop is also huge for me. I hate the gap in the fender well but REALLY hate if I'm scrapping everywhere I go. I'm really leaning towards these shocks over Moton but it sounds like you really can't go wrong either way. I think the KW and BCs are in a whole different category from these. At least when I was researching I found some info that mentioned the KW and BC are good for group events, street, and slight track, but these you are truly upgrading the suspension with an entry level track racing setup. At least that's the info I've found so far.

DEpointfive0 05-11-2016 06:20 AM

JRZ starts at... $4500~ or $5500. Probably $5500

That's all I can add... I'll go back to my hole now

gomer_110 05-11-2016 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeauxTigers1 (Post 3478011)
Fantastic! I'll be sure to save you if we come up with any q's. Any recommendations when ordering? Items to pair it with, sway bars etc? I was looking at Stillen bc as mentioned below they talked about that "softer" sway. Also 6-8 weeks aint bad! Shoot anything over seas and I automatically think it'll be JDM all over again which 2 months is the minimum! LOL.

As far as other things to do at the same time I'd plan on doing front control arms, rear camber and toe arms (assumes using truecoilover setup in rear), eccentric lockout kit for rear arms, stiffer front sway bar, and front sway bar end links. Use SPL for the suspension parts when possible.

As for the rear sway bar, leave it stock.

Slartibartfas 05-11-2016 10:24 AM

Y'all might look into Aragosta, too. They have A G/Z application and say their damper can be serviced by Moton USA.

Spooler 05-11-2016 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slartibartfas (Post 3478174)
Y'all might look into Aragosta, too. They have A G/Z application and say their damper can be serviced by Moton USA.

Sorry man, I know I am slow. Life has a way of doing that to you sometimes. Only a couple more pieces and my Aragosta suspension will be on my car.

OptionZero 05-11-2016 12:08 PM

Ordered my Aragosta Type-S mid March from Bulletproof, still waiting. Not unexpected, just anxious since i got a pile of SPL parts sitting around . . .

IIRC Aragosta can be serviced by whoever does ASTs due to shared components, even if the companies aren't "the same." Heck, I think there's even a special rebuild shop at Infineon which isn't too far away from me.

Jhill 05-11-2016 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeauxTigers1 (Post 3478011)
JRZ seems to be even pricer. I believe their entry level set up was somewhere in the 7500+ range. I had been reading and quite a few people on the forums said they didn't see the gains justifying the cost. These ASTs are right where I was hoping to be. Quick question though, where did you find the info on needing to rebuild the shocks? Is that bc people with this suspension are usually tracking them or do they truly need to be rebuilt that often?



Fantastic! I'll be sure to save you if we come up with any q's. Any recommendations when ordering? Items to pair it with, sway bars etc? I was looking at Stillen bc as mentioned below they talked about that "softer" sway. Also 6-8 weeks aint bad! Shoot anything over seas and I automatically think it'll be JDM all over again which 2 months is the minimum! LOL.



Thanks for the great detail! Repped. The min drop is also huge for me. I hate the gap in the fender well but REALLY hate if I'm scrapping everywhere I go. I'm really leaning towards these shocks over Moton but it sounds like you really can't go wrong either way. I think the KW and BCs are in a whole different category from these. At least when I was researching I found some info that mentioned the KW and BC are good for group events, street, and slight track, but these you are truly upgrading the suspension with an entry level track racing setup. At least that's the info I've found so far.

Yea the BC DR sound like a great option and the concept of raising/lowering the whole strut keeping the stroke length the same is a really cool concept and I would be very tempted to try them, especially at their price point. However after already scraping some areas at Oem height I just can't see myself enjoying daily driving at 1.5 drop. The AST "street" option 4100 series sounds very nice for my use, same oem front rate so no worry of harshness, actually a softer rear rate so maybe even smoother and then a double digressive option (comp and rebound not just comp). This is how my off-road bikes are setup and it's great because you can have a more firm chassis stability through firmer low speeds but then open up on a bigger hit and rebound faster from a bigger hit so the suspension doesn pack up. Sounds like a really good system for uneven road conditions etc. a review below.

AST 4150 Shocks Have Arrived At Vorshlag - SCCAForums.com - SCCA

Halfkiddio 05-11-2016 12:42 PM

After driving my friends Z on a set of JRZ RS Pro's, they are what my own Z will most likely end up with. Stance Pro Comp 2's are also an option you can look into, and IMO, are better than BC's.

JRZ RS Pros MSRP is $5,665 off Forged Performance's website.

Jhill 05-11-2016 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478275)
After driving my friends Z on a set of JRZ RS Pro's, they are what my own Z will most likely end up with. Stance Pro Comp 2's are also an option you can look into, and IMO, are better than BC's.

JRZ RS Pros MSRP is $5,665 off Forged Performance's website.

Yea once they get past 3k I think that is beyond my budget. I'll spend 2k on a fork but that's my main hobby lol. Beside a dual duty car will always be a compromise and I don't think spending 6k on coilovers that will never get truly pushed to the limits because of street tires, street angles, no cage etc etc. if I had a full track car then I could see the point but for me it's not logical.

Never heard of stance, I'll have to look into them all though the name represents an absolutely retarded trend on cars right now so I hope that isn't what they are going for. Only thing that finally made me decide again trying the BC is the min drop is just too low, if I'm going coil over I would rather have a near oem height down to maybe 2in drop that I would seem to think would be the most logical heights for performance focus, not a min 1.5-3 like some of the others.

Just looked them up. Don't think I would go that route, doesn't stick to the Oem rear spring perch. Also sounds like another super low setup. Seems only KW and AST have a min drop in the .5 in range and KW uses proprietary progressive springs. Still think I would go AST.

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 02:20 PM

Stance is an excellent choice and has nothing to do with jacked up car look.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Halfkiddio 05-11-2016 03:12 PM

Stance does well in the super low group, but they also do extremely well in the higher performance driving with their Pro Comp 2's. Another friend of mine just ordered a set, so I will be waiting for his review of them. But I know they do really well in certain time attack cars, with a couple of them being 370's. They also don't drop the car ridiculously low out of the box, and they are fully adjustable.

On the spring location topic, you can specify the spring rates you want to get the ride quality you're looking for. If you want a smooth ride, you can get softer rates and have them valved accordingly.

KW will no longer re-valve the V3's to a different spring rate since everyone was doing that and not buying their Clubsport coils. They would serve you very well, and they would be a great choice.

gomer_110 05-11-2016 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhill (Post 3478316)
Just looked them up. Don't think I would go that route, doesn't stick to the Oem rear spring perch. Also sounds like another super low setup. Seems only KW and AST have a min drop in the .5 in range and KW uses proprietary progressive springs. Still think I would go AST.

Better check your information. Unless they made a big change, AST shocks are true type coilovers in the rear and therefor use a different spring location.

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478368)
Stance does well in the super low group, but they also do extremely well in the higher performance driving with their Pro Comp 2's. Another friend of mine just ordered a set, so I will be waiting for his review of them. But I know they do really well in certain time attack cars, with a couple of them being 370's. They also don't drop the car ridiculously low out of the box, and they are fully adjustable.

On the spring location topic, you can specify the spring rates you want to get the ride quality you're looking for. If you want a smooth ride, you can get softer rates and have them valved accordingly.

KW will no longer re-valve the V3's to a different spring rate since everyone was doing that and not buying their Clubsport coils. They would serve you very well, and they would be a great choice.

Yes Stance carries a wide range of coil overs but Pro Comp II are the best for hard core tracking. There are a few on the forum that run them djtodd for one and he really like them.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Halfkiddio 05-11-2016 03:54 PM

There is also a guy who works for Vengence Road Racing that runs them on his car. He was at the Global Time Attack event at Road Atlanta last weekend. I wasn't there to ask him what all he had done to the car, but from the live stream, it sounded and looked good.

Back on topic, Stance would be a good choice over the V3's IMO.

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 04:31 PM

djtodd generally competes in that event. He has a build thread and some awesome videos.

Jhill 05-11-2016 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3478382)
Better check your information. Unless they made a big change, AST shocks are true type coilovers in the rear and therefor use a different spring location.

Hmm thanks for the heads up I thought I saw they used the oem spring location. Well that's a bummer, not sure I like the idea of transferring that load to the shock towers when it wasn't intended to be there. Well **** maybe I'm all out of options and won't change from oem, nothing really matches the criteria I'm after. Maybe just go koni yellows when the oe wears out, I'll get the rebound damping but no corner balancing.

cv129 05-11-2016 05:33 PM

Quick question though, where did you find the info on needing to rebuild the shocks? Is that bc people with this suspension are usually tracking them or do they truly need to be rebuilt that often?

My 2 cents...maybe I used the word "rebuild" too loosely. What I meant was servicing the shocks. It can be as simple as changing out the shock oils. And in the longer run, especially if shocks are exposed to high heat (engine heat + lots of rapid movements from aggressive driving), I think seals and shims have to be replaced. On nitrogen filled shocks, you should service when shock does not return to its original position on its own (test when shock is off the car, simplify push in and see if it goes back on its own).

I am unsure just exactly how often a service should be performed. Pro race teams check them as often as every session. Some say race tracks usage is the most punishing. Some say uneven road is equally bad. Some says a service is warranted when the adjustment knobs no longer provide the desired changes (like turning it a few position and car still feels the same).

I've seen pictures of high end shocks with oil all gunked up. I think it's best to raise this question to the manufacturer, and also get opinion from rebuilds shop. I just wanna make sure you factor this into your long term expectation.

Best of luck. I feel excited even tho I'm not the one buying haha.

cv129 05-11-2016 05:57 PM

I believe inboard spring makes it harder to properly match spring rate to the shock valving, and that's why "true" coil-over-spring setup is preferred. Please feel free to chime in if I'm incorrect.

As far as the rear spring location, there's a discussion in he below thread

http://www.the370z.com/brakes-suspen...ion-users.html

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhill (Post 3478464)
Hmm thanks for the heads up I thought I saw they used the oem spring location. Well that's a bummer, not sure I like the idea of transferring that load to the shock towers when it wasn't intended to be there. Well **** maybe I'm all out of options and won't change from oem, nothing really matches the criteria I'm after. Maybe just go koni yellows when the oe wears out, I'll get the rebound damping but no corner balancing.

Check out Fortune Auto 500's. Fortune Auto offers custom spring rates and are digressive as well. They will service and rebuild. I have them and they are very nice. I will probably change out my springs when I decide to anything other than drive on the road lol.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Jhill 05-11-2016 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cv129 (Post 3478480)
I believe inboard spring makes it harder to properly match spring rate to the shock valving, and that's why "true" coil-over-spring setup is preferred. Please feel free to chime in if I'm incorrect.

As far as the rear spring location, there's a discussion in he below thread

http://www.the370z.com/brakes-suspen...ion-users.html

Yea I saw that before. It's good to know it can be done but I just don't feel confident about it. It's an expensive car for me and I don't want to be having it disabled while still making payments cause the rear tower got screwed up etc. it's a much simpler design and probably cheaper too so it makes me question why the oem didn't go that route. If you've ever worked in the bizz if there is a cheaper way for a manufacture to do something you can garantee they will do it that way.

Jhill 05-11-2016 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrodz (Post 3478481)
Check out Fortune Auto 500's. Fortune Auto offers custom spring rates and are digressive as well. They will service and rebuild. I have them and they are very nice. I will probably change out my springs when I decide to anything other than drive on the road lol.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Any idea what their min drop is? Also did you go with the stock 11k/8k setup? How harsh is that? Seems I can move up or down 2k through most venders and stick is basically 8/8 so if I go 10/8 I can still drop to 8/8 if 10 is too harsh but 11 is just out of that ability.

Rusty 05-11-2016 08:00 PM

Another thing to think about. If you are running big meats on the rear. :D How much clearance is there between the top of the tire and the coilover? Camber plays an important part in this too. More camber, less clearance.

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 08:12 PM

I am not sure, but I'm lowered about an inch maybe a little more. Here is pic of my Nismo next to a stock one.http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...e03fa034ed.jpg

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Hotrodz 05-11-2016 08:13 PM

Also I know it is not at the top of the highest settings.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Slartibartfas 05-11-2016 09:47 PM

Aragostas for the G37

Spooler 05-11-2016 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhill (Post 3478464)
Hmm thanks for the heads up I thought I saw they used the oem spring location. Well that's a bummer, not sure I like the idea of transferring that load to the shock towers when it wasn't intended to be there. Well **** maybe I'm all out of options and won't change from oem, nothing really matches the criteria I'm after. Maybe just go koni yellows when the oe wears out, I'll get the rebound damping but no corner balancing.

Get with Charles @ Powertrix.com. He is close to you and can hook you up. Give him a call. He is very knowledgeable.

GeauxTigers1 05-12-2016 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3478066)
As far as other things to do at the same time I'd plan on doing front control arms, rear camber and toe arms (assumes using truecoilover setup in rear), eccentric lockout kit for rear arms, stiffer front sway bar, and front sway bar end links. Use SPL for the suspension parts when possible.

As for the rear sway bar, leave it stock.

This is fantastic info! Thanks man, I'll check each of these. i've been reading as well and sounds like numerous people talking about shock bushings being upgraded as well? Also Rear Shock mount reinforcement? I'm curious with the different location than OEM if this has caused any serious headaches on install. I'm taking it to a shop to do so, but I'd rather not have to do some major overhaul if I don't have to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478275)
After driving my friends Z on a set of JRZ RS Pro's, they are what my own Z will most likely end up with. Stance Pro Comp 2's are also an option you can look into, and IMO, are better than BC's.

JRZ RS Pros MSRP is $5,665 off Forged Performance's website.

This is great. I'll need to narrow down my search to comparing AST vs JRZ then. I automatically wrote them off bc the only ones I saw in a quick search were $8k and then another for around $15k.

Hotrodz 05-12-2016 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spooler (Post 3478709)
Get with Charles @ Powertrix.com. He is close to you and can hook you up. Give him a call. He is very knowledgeable.

:iagree: These are really good coil overs for the price!

Halfkiddio 05-12-2016 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeauxTigers1 (Post 3478728)
This is fantastic info! Thanks man, I'll check each of these. i've been reading as well and sounds like numerous people talking about shock bushings being upgraded as well? Also Rear Shock mount reinforcement? I'm curious with the different location than OEM if this has caused any serious headaches on install. I'm taking it to a shop to do so, but I'd rather not have to do some major overhaul if I don't have to.



This is great. I'll need to narrow down my search to comparing AST vs JRZ then. I automatically wrote them off bc the only ones I saw in a quick search were $8k and then another for around $15k.

You would benefit from doing the SPL lower shock mount bushing when you go to a true type coilover, but its not required

. There is really no need to brace the shock tower when you switch. Install on a true type coil is about 20 minutes per side, not including taking the spring bucket arm out and replacing it with an adjustable arm.

If you're comparing AST to JRZ, I would go JRZ hands down. AST's dont seem to last long on heavier cars except for the BMW guys. I would be looking at JRZ and MCS if you want something at that level. I will be going with JRZ next year hopefully.

gomer_110 05-12-2016 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478878)
If you're comparing AST to JRZ, I would go JRZ hands down. AST's dont seem to last long on heavier cars except for the BMW guys.

Any actual data to support this? As far as I knew there were only a handful of people to use AST shocks on a 370Z. I don't recall hearing/seeing any complaints about them.

Halfkiddio 05-12-2016 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gomer_110 (Post 3478901)
Any actual data to support this? As far as I knew there were only a handful of people to use AST shocks on a 370Z. I don't recall hearing/seeing any complaints about them.

It's from what I remember doing research into them a year or so ago. They didn't have a good longevity record on heavier cars, so I stopped digging into them. Let me do some looking and I will see what I can find again.

Halfkiddio 05-12-2016 10:01 AM

From what I remember however, the 4100 series had some pretty substantial reliability issues. They have had issues with the shocks leaking after one season, as well as failures in the design department.

Thats off the top of my head and some quick google searching. I know JRZ's will last 4-5 years with no rebuilds needed, as Sharif has a set on his personal GTR that have yet to leak or go soft since he put them on 4 years ago. He also has the older design that doesn't have bump stops or dust boots.

Rusty 05-12-2016 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478878)
You would benefit from doing the SPL lower shock mount bushing when you go to a true type coilover, but its not required

. There is really no need to brace the shock tower when you switch. Install on a true type coil is about 20 minutes per side, not including taking the spring bucket arm out and replacing it with an adjustable arm.

If you're comparing AST to JRZ, I would go JRZ hands down. AST's dont seem to last long on heavier cars except for the BMW guys. I would be looking at JRZ and MCS if you want something at that level. I will be going with JRZ next year hopefully.

You won't believe how much bind there is with the stock bushings. :eek:

Jhill 05-12-2016 01:44 PM

Anyone had any experience with the tein mono flex or other tein? They have a good adjustment range, keep the oem spring location. One of the guys at z1 really likes them on a co workers car and states his stance are too soft but he's going more and more towards track. Makes me a bit worried how firm the tein ride for daily driver crumbling ca roads.

cv129 05-12-2016 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfkiddio (Post 3478924)

I know JRZ's will last 4-5 years with no rebuilds needed,

I politely disagree here. I would refrain from making such general statement.

Amount of time is not the determining factor. The combination of type of usage and amount of miles determine needs for servicing/rebuilding. None of the high end stuff, if really being used, can retain its performance for that long without any servicing.

For the competitive guys, shock rebuilds are part of the game. Oil degrades, shims and seals weaken due to heat and usage, etc, no way around it. However, there have been cases where people don't even feel anything wrong when shock oil had turned into goo. Go figure (not implying sharif).

.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2