G37 Track/Autocross/Daily Alignment

Whittie

Hi Folks,

I understand that there are G specific forums, however, the level of development is much higher here and a G is just a Z 2+2 with a different name. The average level of maturity is also higher than the G forums...

Anyways, back on track:
I have been doing Autocross events in my new Q60 (another name for G37 - Geez Nissan is confused about what they want to call this car!) and the lack of camber is causing a lot of understeer and destroying tyres. I'm signed up for a couple HPDE days in the next few months and before I go and buy a decent set of tyres (RE-11 or RE-71R, still deciding) I want to get an alignment done.

I have purchased a set of SPL front upper camber/caster arms and so now I'm looking for advice on what sort of alignment to get for this car (booked in for tomorrow), allowing that the additional wheel base may (or may not, not sure!) require a slight difference to a standard Z. So far I plan to get the shop to target:
- Front Camber: -1.7 degrees
- Front Caster: Max the arms will allow (6-7 degrees? Any issues foreseen here?)
- Front Toe: 0
- Rear camber: -1.7 degrees
- Rear Toe: toe in 0.08 inch total (0.04 inch each side, is this OK?)

The biggest uncertainties I have are in regards to the Rear Toe and Front Caster. I don't know what Caster these cars can deal with by just adjusting the top arms or what to tell the mechanic to target for rear toe.

The car is my daily (60 miles round trip commute) and I autocross 1-2 times per month and will track probably 2-3 times per year. Tire life on the street is not a goal of this setup, even tyre wear on the track is.

Thanks!
Tom.

Zauskycop

If you are going with 0 toe in front, then go for more negative camber up there. I would shoot for -2.5 personally. I run that in my Z, and ran it on the One Lap of America for 3500 miles, with no extra substantial wear on the inside of the tires. Rear toe, I go with 1/16" in total (1/32 per side)

Tracy Ramsey

osbornsm

Hello and welcome to the site.

Click here for OEM Alignment specs.

I purchased the same SPL camber arms that you have.

I told the alignment shop:
- "Keep the rear OEM spec"
- "Give the front -2 deg camber and minimum 6 caster"

They were able to get camber/caster/toe exactly where needed with this kit.
Let me know if you have any more questions!

__________________

gomer_110

If you're doing autox a couple times a month I wouldn't go less that -2.5° of camber in the front. I run -3.0° up front on mine.

__________________
'11 370Z Nismo #528 Fast Intentions | Stillen | Motordyne | Uprev | CSF | Zspeed | Z1 Motorsports | AST | Swift | SPC | SPL | Whiteline | Hotchkis | Bride | Schroth | Robispec | Cusco | Nismo | Volk | Forgestar | Hoosier | RJM
'17 Titan Bone Stock

Whittie

Thanks folks!

That's much more camber than I was expecting up front, thanks for the input.

Is 1.7 going to be enough in the back then? Ive been checking temps of the tyres after each autocross run and the back is hotter on the inside at stock camber so was going to leave it there. I will revise if necessary.

It's probably worth mentioning here that the suspension is otherwise standard. The Q60s limited comes with the 'performance tuned sport suspension', which is 2 levels up from base. I wouldn't call it NISMO, but it's more sport than the sport and replaces what used to be called Infiniti Performance Line. It's surprisingly good on the track, not much roll and quite firm, but obviously not coil-over firm.

Whittie

Well, I went and got the alignment on Friday. Final specs:

Front
-2.4 degrees camber
- 0 toe
- 7.4 degrees caster

Caster is maxed at that camber. With the car running at stock height, the control arms are bottomed out on the adjuster to reach that level, to get more camber I would have to sacrifice caster, etc.

Rear:
- 2.0 degrees camber
- 0.03 degrees toe

There was some miscommunication with the rear toe where I had asked for 1/32 toe in and they interpreted that as 1/32 of a degree, not 1/32 of an inch. Bit of a mistake on both sides, but I didn't know what 1/32 was supposed to be in degrees so I figured it's still toe in and just leave it. Turns out that 1/32 is about 0.8 degrees, so it's got way less rear toe. I won't take it back just yet, I'll try the setup at an event first and see how taily it is, if it's bad then I'll get it adjusted.

I was able to find a couple of pretty nice freeway on-ramps over the weekend and the front is FAR better than before! I was pulling higher G-force that before the alignment without any of that washout understeer. I wasn't going 10/10 as it was a public road, but next event is Saturday and I'm expecting a great change from the really horrible understeer the car used to have.

If I need to change the toe, I'm thinking about maybe picking up one of these:
Align Your Car With SmartStrings, SmartCamber | Smart Racing Products

Probably over-kill, but would allow me to fiddle with the car whenever I like without forking over $100 each time.

Halfkiddio

How much hotter is the inside of the tire? There can be a little variation, but too much and you're not using the tire completely. And for what its worth, I have ran -1.8 in the rear with RE71R's and seen decent temps. But I also play on a road that is unlike any autocross or road course.

Whittie

Less than 10 degrees, it certainly wasn't a lot, I just wasn't sure if I should be going with more camber. However, given how much more traction I've got in the front now, I expect I'll be pulling higher total G forces and hence working the outside of the tyre harder. I'll take temps again at the next event to see how it looks and report back.

Halfkiddio

Less than 10 degrees is good. You don't want to be over that by too much though. Find out how they do at the next one and go from there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rusty

On your caster. Is that positive or negative number?

__________________

浪人 - 殺し屋
"The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only"
http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html

Whittie

Caster is always positive!

Negative caster would result in dramatic instability, the wheel not returning to center without being directing by the steering wheel and positive camber gain (instead of negative gain) during steering throw.

I like to recall what an old mentor once told me "Caster is faster"

For go-fast applications where steering weight is not the main priority for driver comfort, one should pretty much always target max caster possible. In my situation, with stock ride-height I don't benefit from the negative camber gained by reducing the static ride of the car, so to be able to get my target -2.5 degrees of camber, this meant that with the adjustment maxed out on the control arms 7.4 degrees of caster is all that was achievable. With a lowered vehicle it would be possible to get more caster for the same camber settings, I've seen 9 degrees mentioned on this forum for one track racer.

Rusty

I'll give you a little hint about caster. Cars at one time had negative caster. Some even had a different settings for the left and right. That's the reason I asked the question. I used to do alignments back in the day.

I have the SPL arms too. My settings now are -2 camber and +6 caster. I still have room to go to +8 caster and - 4 camber if I want to.

__________________

浪人 - 殺し屋
"The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only"
http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html

Whittie

That was quite a long time ago, when positive camber would generate traction on a very different tyre construction than we drive around on today

The track I used to run a few years ago was 8 right hand and one left hand corner. I had my car setup with different camber and caster left to right to account for the variation. Oval cars also run setups dedicated to only turning in the one direct, so varying setup left/right is pretty common today still too.

I digress, but I do like to spend time working on and thinking about these things.

Whittie

So I got out to the track today for an autocross and the car was great!

My peak G loading went from 1.10 to 1.15 lateral G and my sustained long radius sweeper G loading went from 0.95 to 1.02. That's a 5-7% increase JUST IN ALIGNMENT.

The last time out I was 1.8s slower than a gentleman in a Porsche Cayman S and this time I was 0.1s faster, so I am super happy. Tyre temperatures were good, with the inside about 10 degrees hotter than the outside and the middle temp sitting right iin between with the same pressure as before. Tyre wear is alos MUCH better, with the inside of the front tyres showing wear now where-as before they looked untouched. The understeer is gone and now when the front tyres slip they don't make that high-pitched screech that comes from running on the outside edge, instead they give that harsh shudder that shows the whole tyre surface is in contact and slipping over the concrete.

Unfortunately, I did not have a single clean run, I just could not get comfortable with the rear end of the car, which is not unexpected with 0 toe. I'm going to start bumping up the toe in 0.1 degree increments and see how it goes. It was fast around the tight stuff, but I just couldn't get to a happy place with the front having a LOT more grip than the rear, which is a nice change from the horrendous understeer last time out, but not as fast as it could be. Watch this space.

Last time out:


This time out:

Zauskycop

Now toss a stiff front swaybar on there and watch the improvement!! Good job!

Tracy Ramsey