Rear speakers; yes or no?

chknhawk · 09-30-2012, 12:14 PM

No. Now days people actually record in 4, 5, or more channel audio due to the demand for hd and surround sound. I can't agree that 2 speakers is ever better than 4.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

asdfsammich · 09-30-2012, 04:25 PM

Makes more sense that a well done 2CH + sub in a 2 seater is far better than a colliding 4CH.

Tapatalk & such etc

bigaudiofanat · 09-30-2012, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chknhawk

No. Now days people actually record in 4, 5, or more channel audio due to the demand for hd and surround sound. I can't agree that 2 speakers is ever better than 4.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Yes concerts, dolby, DTS and so on encoded DVD's and SACD's, but a normal cd is reordered in 2 channel stereo.

If you really want to get technical some stuff is recorded in mono and mixed to be stereo.

I am kind of a audio nut.

jayl · 09-30-2012, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naenyn

What kind? How do you balance the sound between front and rear without having them blasting in your ear? =]

sorry for the delayed response.. I got Infinity 329CF 105W Peak 3-1/2 -Inch Custom Fit ... from Amazon.

I dont feel they are blasting in my ear at all, just very good fill all around.

axmea? · 10-01-2012, 03:47 AM

If you your goal is SQ, and want rear fill in Z (small interior), the SQ approach would be to have delays set up for the rears. Not easy to execute unless you have high quality processing and components. In the end, the sq approach is really for the discerning ear and for top end car audio competition. If you just want to enjoy the music and have a decent rear fill, the 3.5" rear is not a good option. A good 5.25 hi quality 2 way or component is a good way to go.

09-30-2012, 12:14 PM	#16 (permalink)
chknhawk Track Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Kentucky Posts: 541 Drives: Like a batouttahell! Rep Power: 14	No. Now days people actually record in 4, 5, or more channel audio due to the demand for hd and surround sound. I can't agree that 2 speakers is ever better than 4. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD __________________ \| AEM \| INVIDIA \| GREDDY \| STANCE \| NISMO \| SETRAB \| STOPTECH \| HAWK \| TOYO \| HANKOOK \| BRIDE (wishlist) \|

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
rear speakers	nismochiq	Nismo 370Z	2	11-27-2011 11:58 PM
Re: Rear Speakers or None?	OldGuy	Audio & Video	59	03-04-2011 11:27 AM
No rear speakers!	ken72z	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	18	01-22-2010 12:57 AM
Rear speakers	Lost	Audio & Video	11	06-23-2009 09:55 AM
rear speakers	madmocasin	DIY Section (Do-It-Yourself)	2	06-08-2009 08:16 PM

09-30-2012, 04:25 PM	#17 (permalink)
asdfsammich Enthusiast Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Southern California Posts: 456 Drives: 09 370Z SR MT Rep Power: 13	Makes more sense that a well done 2CH + sub in a 2 seater is far better than a colliding 4CH. Tapatalk & such etc

10-01-2012, 03:47 AM	#20 (permalink)
axmea? A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: SoCal Posts: 6,235 Drives: WELL ZED PW 6MT Rep Power: 53241	If you your goal is SQ, and want rear fill in Z (small interior), the SQ approach would be to have delays set up for the rears. Not easy to execute unless you have high quality processing and components. In the end, the sq approach is really for the discerning ear and for top end car audio competition. If you just want to enjoy the music and have a decent rear fill, the 3.5" rear is not a good option. A good 5.25 hi quality 2 way or component is a good way to go.