Quote:
Originally Posted by Endgame
The Z's brakes have been noted to be better than the Cayman S's, unless you pay the almost 10k for the carbon ceramic; and they will last all day long so say the reviews. Your comment sounds like the comments that the Porsche guys were saying about the GT-R and look what it did on the track against the 'Porsche pedigree'. Oh and the 911 is twice as much as the GT-R also.
I still predict the Z will come very close on the track. I will recant if I am wrong.
|
Noted to be better for stopping a few times from 60. They dont last more than a few laps on a track because the pads get cooked. They are Akebono's not Porsche brakes.
My comments sound like someone who looks at facts and has seen more than a few trackdays.
Also, FYI, the 911 line starts a few grand under the MSRP of the GT-R. The Turbo is around 140k. Then the GT3 RS is around 160k, which would be twice as much as a GT-R.
Also careful hehe, I've been on the track in every car we're talking about... this is my STI along with my friends at the last few track events... I took PLENTY of laps in the GT-R and the GT3. I can tell you that the GT-R is MUCH faster than all those cars I mentioned except for the 997 GT2. The GT-R is absurdly fast..
997 GT2, 996 Carrera, CLK Black Edition, Nissan GT-R, 08 STI Full race, Off camera 997 Turbo, Twin Turbo full race 350Z, 997 GT3
Let this be a friendly discussion too, I mean no harm
