View Single Post
Old 06-18-2009, 01:32 PM   #634 (permalink)
Robert_Nash
Track Member
 
Robert_Nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Middle TN/Savannah GA
Posts: 762
Drives: '14 Q60IPL/'14Armada
Rep Power: 17
Robert_Nash is just really niceRobert_Nash is just really niceRobert_Nash is just really niceRobert_Nash is just really nice
Default

An excellent post but I'm not sure that it does clear up the issue.

As there is no engine oil cooler installed on the vehicle in stock form, adding an engine oil cooler is clearly not a "replacement part". Further, as the vehicle, from most accounts, does function as intended when used legally on the street, I would think that the addition of an engine oil cooler could be reasonably construed as a modification intended to improve performance (i.e. make the car trackable).

Finally, regardless of the burden of proof (not to discount that important fact), a consumer still has to initiate legal proceedings which is generally not an easy, inexpensive or quick process...even if the consumer ultimately prevails and is reimbursed for any legal expenses, etc, it's still not an easy process.

If I'm missing something critical here please elaborate...again, excellent post IMAHO.
__________________
Robert
-My Basset Hound Is Smarter Than Your Honor Student and Barack Obama -

Last edited by Robert_Nash; 06-18-2009 at 01:40 PM.
Robert_Nash is offline