View Single Post
Old 06-18-2009, 11:06 AM   #31 (permalink)
semtex
A True Z Fanatic
 
semtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Behind enemy lines
Age: 54
Posts: 5,995
Drives: People to drink
Rep Power: 32
semtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I never stated that getting a reflash done first wouldn't yield good gains. Getting a reflash done, whenever you do it, should yield good gains. I simply believe that given the cost of a reflash, if you're planning to do a bunch of bolt-ons anyway, it makes more sense to do them all first, then do the reflash one time, vs. doing it before and then again after and therefore paying for it twice. If the added expense doesn't bother you, or you don't plan to do any bolt-ons for a while (or at all) then have at it. Either way it's your choice. But I personally don't feel like laying out the funds for a reflash twice, given the mod path I've taken.

In so far as the OP is obviously planning to do a bunch of bolt-ons, I believe that it would make more sense for him to do them prior to the reflash, strictly from a cost-control standpoint. In other words, whether or not he'd get good gains from a reflash is not something I'm disputing here.
__________________
"There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna
316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) | 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10)
Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.

Last edited by semtex; 06-18-2009 at 11:12 AM.
semtex is offline   Reply With Quote