View Single Post
Old 10-12-2010, 08:33 PM   #177 (permalink)
optiontrader
Track Member
 
optiontrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Smog Hell, SoCal
Posts: 595
Drives: 40th
Rep Power: 16
optiontrader is on a distinguished road
Default

^^^ Yes - less weight, better gas mileage.

Bigger engines? Higher displacement at low revs with mad power is achieveable at low price points. Once you start trying to spin that crank faster, high revvin' engines are more expensive to develop (but less so to manufacture - but still $$$). The E92's redline above 8k is a good example. High revvin' supercars with V8/10/12 that rev above 8k are another.

Extending that power band between shifts is a golden rule - the more time you're on the pedal and not swinging that lever, the faster times you'll get. But now with dual-clutch transmissions getting easier and cheaper to manufacture - it's gets less critical. But that's another discussion in itself...
__________________

40th Anniversary Z - 3M Paint Protection Film, CA Legal Tint! (70/40)
optiontrader is offline   Reply With Quote