View Single Post
Old 09-27-2010, 05:18 PM   #38 (permalink)
G37sHKS
A True Z Fanatic
 
G37sHKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,183
Drives: 09 G37S Coupe 7AT
Rep Power: 20
G37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond reputeG37sHKS has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote from MotorDyne.

I think you guys are right.. maybe its same design as 350z Manifold but made to fit the VHR..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydrazine View Post
The 3.7 liter engine is losing a lot of "potential" area under the curve by having short runners.

The 3.5 liter engine is losing peak power by having longer runners.

Each stock engine has a different compromise within their stock power curve.

So the thing to do is combine the two curves and switch between one or the other at their crossover point. (RPM dependant).

This way the best of both can be attained... for both engines!

Simple in concept but it will be a great engineering challenge to implement.
Read more at Early stages of HR/VHR intake manifold dyno testing. - MY350Z.COM Forums
G37sHKS is offline   Reply With Quote