View Single Post
Old 09-23-2010, 02:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
BGTV8
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 03350 Australia
Posts: 1,513
Drives: 09 Nissan 370Z M6
Rep Power: 39973
BGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond reputeBGTV8 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Whiich is exactly why a mechanical engineer did the load calc's - and yes, you are correct about spike loads, but the Monash University Road Safety Research Unit her in Melbourne are world leaders in accident analysis - Victoria was the first state globally to introduce mandatory fitment and wearing of seat belts and this is a subject very well understood around here.

F16 pilots are usually a lot younger but more importantly, a lot fitter than me, and the conventional wisdom is that a susutained load (greater than 80 millseconds) of 8G will prove fatal to 75% of the normal driving population.

Yes, spike loads of 30-80G can be tolerated by the human body, even in old farts like me, but not for much more than 5-16 milliseconds according to the folk at Monash Uni.

Not wanting to divert from the original post, though .... I will simply say that a full harness wil always be better in any sort of accident on a track than a lap-sash harness, and the bar I;ve fitted is well able to absorb the energy/loads involved.

ALso why I hav ebeen at pains to make sure that fixtures for lap belts are similarly attached to points in the bodyshell that are engineered for the loads.

As I said, these are all installed at the owners risk .. 'nuff said.

RB
BGTV8 is offline   Reply With Quote