Quote:
Originally Posted by MMC Racing
Because you've drove a LF-A too, right?  |
No, I haven't driven an LF-A. In this case I trust the reviews and my personal experience with the GT-R al though that's not really the point. The point is as I've explained, being that test track numbers are far from the only variables that deem a particular automobile superior, worth its price, etc, etc. If you're having troubles comprehending this I truly feel sorry for you.
The GT-R lacks a lot of the credentials most true driving enthusiast desire. Just because an automobile happens to be quicker to one or the other doesn’t by default mean it’s flat out the better car. Now if your life depended on bragging rights and winning stop light races sure the GTR is really hard to beat.
But if you actually like to drive, there are a **** load of automobiles more desirable than a Nissan GT-R believe it or not. This is probably hard for you to swallow seeing as you apparently own a GT-R and think its God’s gift to automobiles. You being a smartass asking “Because you’ve drove a LF-A too, right” just goes farther on to prove just how much in denial you are.
And regardless the only reason the GT-R stands a chance in hell against the LF-A in the ¼ mile is due to AWD. The LF-A has a lot more top end power trapping the ¼ in 124-126 on average. But again, this is besides the point.
Anyone with any real knowledge of cars understands what I’m talking about.