View Single Post
Old 04-26-2009, 09:00 AM   #19 (permalink)
semtex
A True Z Fanatic
 
semtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Behind enemy lines
Age: 54
Posts: 5,995
Drives: People to drink
Rep Power: 32
semtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by initialgemini View Post
back pressure tubes? I would imagine those are more to achieve the right "exhaust note" rather then effect the overall velocity of the exhaust gases.
Correct me if im wrong here, but wouldn't narrowing the piping to increase exhaust velocity be more effective than adding "backpressure" tubes.
No. The whole point of backpressure tubes is that, past a certain exhaust velocity, they're bypassed. In other words, they're variable -- they give you backpressure at low rpm (which is where you want it), but don't restrict flow at higher rpms. If you just narrow the piping, you lose that variability. These tubes are really no different than what HKS did on their exhaust for the 350, so I'm not sure why everyone is so puzzled by these secondary tubes. (Well, maybe people haven't ever seen the HKS 350 exhaust or something.)

__________________
"There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna
316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) | 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10)
Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.
semtex is offline   Reply With Quote