View Single Post
Old 07-10-2010, 10:23 PM   #976 (permalink)
Phimosis
Enthusiast Member
 
Phimosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oildale, CA
Posts: 412
Drives: 2013 911 4S
Rep Power: 416
Phimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond reputePhimosis has a reputation beyond repute
Default

'An off-road only car owned by someone I know' was sent to Stillen to have them do a pre-CARB supercharger install. The sales department at Stillen said that the first kits they produced were making 8 lbs of boost on the dyno, but were making more when being driven on the street. Now they are shipping their kits with a re-sized pully to keep boost at 8 lbs while being street driven. This particular car was installed with the new pulley. It already had Stillen high flow catalytic convertors, Stillen headers, Stillen cat back exhaust and Stillen G3 intakes on it. Previously it was tuned with an 8,000 rpm redline and made almost 15hp more, but was reverted to the factory tune for the baseline prior to supercharger install.

Here are the dyno results:



Here are my observations/impressions:

1) Based on previous dyno's results on this car the combination of headers, cats, intakes and exhaust netted 27 hp over stock, with the 8,000 rpm tune, it was 40hp above stock. Using that data; this car without ANY mods on Stillen's dyno should have dyno'd at 287 whp (314-27). This gives a decent indication of how optimistic Stillen's dyno is.

2) If you estimate that this car would have dyno'd an additional 13 whp for the previous 8,000 rpm tune, it would be around 327 whp for an "all bolt on setup." If you also guesstimate that this car would have dyno'd at least 10 whp less if it had stock cats and headers, that would be 412 whp with S/C. So, for those comparing S/C with exhaust vs N/A with intake, headers, cats, exhaust, and tuning, the S/C route only has about an 85 whp advantage.

3) When Stillen released this product and advertised 515 hp, they used a 15% frictional loss in their hp estimate from their dyno numbers (515 x .85 = 438). Using the same 15% estimate, this car would be making 497 hp.

4) Based on Stillen's advertisement of 515 hp on a car with cat back exhaust and otherwise stock, I was expecting to see at least 525 hp with the cats and headers. So the pulley change to keep boost down is costing (educated guess) around 30 hp.

5) On the dyno chart, the torque curve post supercharger is 18 lb/foot lower than the baseline at 2,800 rpm. LOOK CLOSELY HERE. This is not artifact. On the baseline setup, the torque progressively goes up at throttle tip in and peaks once the throttle is open. Then the VVEL keeps the torque curve nearly flat. After supercharging, the torque goes down at throttle tip in, then comes back once the computer has sorted things out. It happens every time you abruptly open the throttle. It takes about 500 milliseconds to do this, but it's annoying as hell. The driving impression: you get is good torque until half throttle, then bog if you go to full throttle. It's really annoying to have to remeber to squeeze the throttle open rather than whack it open, especialy at 60 mph in high gear (like if wanted to pass someone, although I doubt this 'off-road only' car would ever see that kind of manouvre). This phenominon would happen on big Holly double pumper 4 barrel carbs on a small displacement V8's. When you whack the throttle open, the A/F ratio goes too rich and power drops. Also, I had the first year ('98) Suzuki TL1000R, which had fuel injection, and about 10% of the times that you whack the throttle open, it would bog. Most times it worked fine. A/F ratio? Ignition advance? Interestingly, the A/F ratio after supercharging is much richer than the stock program on throttle tip in. Could this be the culprit? Regardless, I think this can be fixed with some tinkering and an ECU update.

6) Using the old addage that it takes about a 30 hp upgrade before you can notice a difference in power, that 30 hp difference doesn't occur until 5,000 rpm. Realistically, I notice a difference at 4,000 rpm. But don't be fooled, opening the throttle at 3,000 rpm doesnt produce torque like an american V-8.

7) In a racing situations, keeping this engine wound as tightly as possible, 7,500 rpm shifts will drop you back to 6,000 rpm. At 6,000 rpm it's making 340 whp. Comparing this to a Nissan GTR, which dyno's about 10 whp higher (430 whp average of 3 runs, motortrend 2009), you only need 4750 rpm to get 350 whp. What does this mean to you? A gtr is going to have a wider useable power band (4,750 to 7,000) vs (6,000 to 7,500).

More to come later.....

Last edited by Phimosis; 07-11-2010 at 11:25 PM.
Phimosis is offline   Reply With Quote