Well, the reason I'm asking is because in the thread on Stillen vs. Berk HFCs, someone (not you - zman1910 I think) stated that if you're going to get CELs even with the HFCs, then we might as well get test pipes to maximize output. So now I'm curious to know what gains the Berk test pipes produce over the Berk HFCs. Are you aware of what Berk claims for their test pipes? (I looked on their website and didn't see anything.) Of course, if you didn't do a baseline while it was stock, then getting a dyno now won't tell us definitively what gain the test pipes yield anyway. (I'm just as guilty of this.) But yeah, what I'm really after is finding out how much more gain we get out of Berk's test pipes vs. their HFCs. Let me know if you're aware of any data on this.
Edit: I sent a PM to BerkTech to see if he has anything.
__________________
"There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna
316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) | 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10)
Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.
Last edited by semtex; 04-15-2009 at 09:34 AM.
|