04-08-2009, 01:53 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Grand Prix of Endurance
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wstar
Well, if he's right about the fuel getting cut during engine braking, then yes engine braking would save more gas than coasting. However, I find this hard to believe. Cut fuel = no more combustion. The drivetrain would simply be spinning the engine and sucking air through the pistons for compression braking, but without any ignitions happening (which means really they could cut the spark plug current off too). I suppose in theory this sounds possible, but I would think I would hear the difference between an engine that's undergoing combustion and one that isn't, and I would think the transition between the two states would be rather abrupt and noticeable. Sure seems pretty smooth to me.
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm just saying I find it hard to believe
|
There is a distinct change in pitch between accelerating and coasting.
__________________
We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary.
|
|
|