View Single Post
Old 05-02-2010, 02:57 PM   #45 (permalink)
semtex
A True Z Fanatic
 
semtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Behind enemy lines
Age: 54
Posts: 5,995
Drives: People to drink
Rep Power: 32
semtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond reputesemtex has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy View Post
All that means is that the car is either made with more robust parts and/or has been tuned so it can be raced out-of-the-box. It is given "a" foundation that can be put on the track. It does not mean that it IS a race car that can survive all the rigors of the sport itself or the track without additional extensions being added or made to the car.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your logic, but it seems to me you're trying to have it both ways. On one hand you want to say that track-ready means it's ready to be raced out of the box. But then you immediately say that all it is is a foundation and you can't really race it without additional extensions. Well which is it? If you can't race it without additional stuff, then it's not ready to be raced out of the box, is it?

As for more robust parts, what parts does the Nismo come with that are more robust than the standard sport pkg? Definitely not the brake pads (which is what this particular thread is about). They're the same pads as on the standard non-Nismo models. I'm not sure why you're dragging the oil cooler issue into this; I don't recall anyone saying anything about the Nismo's lack of a cooler in this thread.

Anyway, the only point I was trying to make was that the Nismo isn't track-ready, or race-ready, or however you want to put it, without a number of upgrades, like the brake pads, for example. I think you and I agree on that point. The same thing can be said for the regular non-Nismo models, or pretty much any other car for that matter, so this doesn't make the Nismo a special exception. But that's my point. There's nothing terribly special about the Nismo as far as track-readiness goes. If the Nismo Z isn't track-ready without additional equipment, then the standard non-Nismo Z is just as track-ready as the Nismo Z; the standard non-Nismo Z is just as good a foundation, as you put it, as the Nismo Z. Both variations require the same additional equipment, do they not? (e.g., upgraded brake pads, oil cooler, etc.) And the only reason I'm flagging this as an issue is because it contradicts Nissan's marketing. Really, it's Nissan's marketing that I have a beef with, not the car itself.
__________________
"There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna
316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) | 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10)
Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.

Last edited by semtex; 05-02-2010 at 03:02 PM.
semtex is offline   Reply With Quote