Quote:
Originally Posted by F.I. Inc.
On the contrary, we actually picked up torque and power throughout! At the highest gap for a torque increase it was at 4300 RPM's. We had an increase of 18 FT LBS. A far as power, the highest gap increase was at 4300 as well as 5900 RPM's. That increase was around 15-16 RWH. This is just a tid bit, I promise I will post the dynos soon. As far as the tune, what we were mainly able to do is clean the A/F up which made the car safe. The timing we demanded was kicked back by the ECU and I feel higher octane fuel than our California 91 garbage will help the car perform better!
|
Outstanding. Thx for the reassurance, Tony.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidZ
I think he meant that the timing adjustments they wanted would have stayed if the fuel wasn't trash. If that's true, thats good news for people with access to 93 octane.
|
Higher octane would certainly help, but Tony's experience is consistent with mine. The timing adjustments we made went nowhere, and I put Shell 93 in my car.
__________________
"There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna
316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) | 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10)
Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.
|