View Single Post
Old 03-24-2010, 02:05 PM   #92 (permalink)
F.I. Inc.
The370Z.com Sponsor
 
F.I. Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 2,989
Drives: 2010 GT-R/2007 F-250
Rep Power: 685
F.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by semtex View Post
Not trying to rain on the parade here, but I have to say that I find the absence of any comment on the impact of these headers on low-end torque and power somewhat conspicuous. What happened on the low end? Please tell me that the gains in the midrange didn't come at a huge expense on the low end. *keeping fingers crossed*
On the contrary, we actually picked up torque and power throughout! At the highest gap for a torque increase it was at 4300 RPM's. We had an increase of 18 FT LBS. A far as power, the highest gap increase was at 4300 as well as 5900 RPM's. That increase was around 15-16 RWH. This is just a tid bit, I promise I will post the dynos soon. As far as the tune, what we were mainly able to do is clean the A/F up which made the car safe. The timing we demanded was kicked back by the ECU and I feel higher octane fuel than our California 91 garbage will help the car perform better!
__________________
Follow us on Facebook: Fast Intentions Inc.
Phone: (805) 522-FAST (3278)
Email: tony@fastintentions.com
www.fastintentions.com
"FUELED BY PASSION"
F.I. Inc. is offline   Reply With Quote