Nissan 370Z Forum - View Single Post - STILLEN 370Z Supercharger System

stormcrow · 03-16-2010, 10:35 PM

Kyle -

Firstly, let me say kudos and congratulations. It seems you guys have done your best to put out a solid kit and I look forward to hearing some feedback from the soon-to-be new owners.

I do have a few questions, if you will indulge me. You stated that Nissan recommends "draw through" setups for their MAF. Granted, I will not argue the point that both F/I cars that you mentioned and all N/A Nissan cars do come with a "draw through" setup. But, the two F/I cars you mentioned are OEM turbo cars and their ECU programming has been stringently coded to accept the fact that the temperatures being read by the MAF sensor are certainly not the temperatures of the charge going into the intake post compressor. This is, arguably, not the appropriate setup for an aftermarket F/I application running on an N/A ECU.

When utilizing an ECU that is designed for N/A applications, how do you figure that it is better to run "draw through" as opposed to "blow through" when blow through gives actual IATs to the ECU to utilize via the MAF temp sensor versus the colder, denser air pre-compressor of the "draw through"? When the ECU believes the intake temps are 70 degrees, but the charge entering the intake is really 180 degrees, this can be a very detrimental thing.

Also, I take it you guys are using a recirculating bypass valve, as well, and no venting to the atmosphere or BOV? I didn't see anything mentioned about this in the release.

Thank you, sir, for your time.

03-16-2010, 10:35 PM	#139 (permalink)
stormcrow Enthusiast Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Alpharetta, GA Posts: 267 Drives: 2010 370Z Nismo TT Rep Power: 15	Kyle - Firstly, let me say kudos and congratulations. It seems you guys have done your best to put out a solid kit and I look forward to hearing some feedback from the soon-to-be new owners. I do have a few questions, if you will indulge me. You stated that Nissan recommends "draw through" setups for their MAF. Granted, I will not argue the point that both F/I cars that you mentioned and all N/A Nissan cars do come with a "draw through" setup. But, the two F/I cars you mentioned are OEM turbo cars and their ECU programming has been stringently coded to accept the fact that the temperatures being read by the MAF sensor are certainly not the temperatures of the charge going into the intake post compressor. This is, arguably, not the appropriate setup for an aftermarket F/I application running on an N/A ECU. When utilizing an ECU that is designed for N/A applications, how do you figure that it is better to run "draw through" as opposed to "blow through" when blow through gives actual IATs to the ECU to utilize via the MAF temp sensor versus the colder, denser air pre-compressor of the "draw through"? When the ECU believes the intake temps are 70 degrees, but the charge entering the intake is really 180 degrees, this can be a very detrimental thing. Also, I take it you guys are using a recirculating bypass valve, as well, and no venting to the atmosphere or BOV? I didn't see anything mentioned about this in the release. Thank you, sir, for your time. Last edited by stormcrow; 03-16-2010 at 10:37 PM.