View Single Post
Old 03-12-2010, 10:42 PM   #31 (permalink)
DooDooBrown
Base Member
 
DooDooBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ranson, WV
Posts: 178
Drives: 09 370 Touring w/spt
Rep Power: 16
DooDooBrown is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fullmonty View Post
Out of my station our Engine has CAFS, and has worked great on both car fires and structures, I wouldn't call it overrated. Granted I would not recommend spraying foam on a building that’s fully involved right away because I don't see any effect from it. But for car fires it has worked really great and for room and contents fires its worked pretty good. It doesn't do anything water can't do though.
Disagree. My department just purchased 40 new engines, all of which where outfitted with CAFS. Just recieved a directive from the higher ups telling us not to use, as its effects are minimal, and the costs are too great. Sure, it works a little better than water on car fires, but there is no justification for spending the extra money. Not to mention the compressors themselves have proved to be a nightmare. Didn't really like them either, because the hoselines would kink too easily..... Whats wrong with water? We have used it for the past 300 years and it has done fine....
DooDooBrown is offline   Reply With Quote