View Single Post
Old 08-19-2020, 01:24 PM   #13 (permalink)
ZX_man
Base Member
 
ZX_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: ME
Posts: 49
Drives: 2013 Silver 370 MT
Rep Power: 13427
ZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond reputeZX_man has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Thanks everyone for the responses. I wanted to say a couple more things just for the sake of getting thoughts down.

The small titanium screws that thread into the alumninum are torqued to 12.5 ftlbs per SPL spec. I've ran FEA on alumninum threads in the past and the safety factors are pretty low for stripping, so I'll be careful not to over-torque these screws.

While it seems the yield strength of 6061 aluminum is sufficient to withstand cornering loads in this application, the modulus of elasticity of the material is 68.9 compared to steel's 205 (gigapascals). An alumninum part will therefore deform three times as much as a steel part of the same geometry under the same load case. For a suspension component, this mean your allignment is going to change slightly under heavy cornering. This is most likely a moot point because the camber arm seems to have a larger cross section->lesser stresses->lesser deflection. I'd be curious to do strain tests on both of these camber arms and compare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptionZero View Post
why you didn't get the rest of the SPL suspension components
Later down the road, yes that's the plan. Currently I'm not tracking the car.
__________________
"'He who shall be last, shall be sideways and smiling.' - Baby Jesus" - Jeremy Clarkson
__________________
ZX_man is offline   Reply With Quote