View Single Post
Old 07-15-2020, 09:07 AM   #34 (permalink)
2011 Nismo#91
A True Z Fanatic
 
2011 Nismo#91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,401
Drives: slowly
Rep Power: 40569
2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptionZero View Post
I will defer to those with more track experience than I, and i see your point generally that a blank 1 pc has more mass and therefore more thermal capacity than a 2 pc . .

but don't all our current 2 pc options also have superior internal venting (for lack of a better term) to funnel air through the inside and therefore cool better on track?

is it your experience that the venting doesn't matter as much as just having more mass?
Venting is the same internally. Every mfg. has their own little version of better but as long as they have some form of curved internal venting you're good.

Less mass is great, but now now you need to add cooling, the faster heating and cooling stresses out more components, higher peak temps, and on top of that more money. If your racing then yeah none of that matters, for an extra .2 seconds or whatever, could mean a position. I'd see that money better spent on another track weekend (more seat time), 18" wheels (less weight, lower costs, more selection), aero, data analysis, etc. If replacements were more inline with 1 piece rotors I could see the benefit but, to me it's a money sink within a money sink.

Last edited by 2011 Nismo#91; 07-15-2020 at 09:19 AM.
2011 Nismo#91 is offline   Reply With Quote