View Single Post
Old 12-22-2019, 10:11 AM   #30 (permalink)
turtle64b
Track Member
 
turtle64b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3366
turtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Since no one wants to buy the fuel pump assembly that I accidentally bought back at the beginning of the year, I am toying with making a custom harness and putting an OEM (maybe upgrade the pump later) fuel pump assembly behind the driver's seat. This would both combat the fuel starvation issue as well as provide more flow. But that's for a different thread haha. I'm currently with CJM S1-SE with an Aeromotive 340lph and ID1050x.

I definitely think that you are going to get maximum flow with the 4" intake. The reason I didn't go higher than 3.5" is because the manifold pressure with the 3.5 setup is so closely resembled the filterless datalogging that I did earlier in the year after initial installation on this car. I should research the science behind velocity stacking, since that may aid in suction efficiency, which led to the higher pressures you see.
turtle64b is offline   Reply With Quote