Quote:
Originally Posted by semtex
You're damn straight I have an attitude about it. Go back and review the thread starting with post #23, where bullitt5897 first suggests that it might be SRM. A bunch of guys including the OP immediately poo-poo the idea, I chime in and say hey, instead of debating this to death, why don't you just turn SRM off and see what happens? I mean, it's a simple push of a button, it's not like you have to break any tools out. I even go as far as to clarify that while I agree that SRM wouldn't account for this behavior if it's functioning as designed, that doesn't discount the possibility of a malfunctioning SRM being the culprit (post #35). So does he ever try it? Nope. So arrogant and self-assured he is of his logic that he can't bring himself to just push a button to give it a try and rule out the possibility that his SRM is malfunctioning. So, you want to talk about e-attitude? That kind of pig-headedness is the epitome of attitude, IMO. TW says it's great to see this forum work in such a constructive way. Well I'm glad he feels that way. But personally, I found his attitude downright frustrating and, in light of the confirmation that it was SRM all along, foolish and anything but constructive. And if it's rude of me to say so, then so be it. I don't give a sh*t. Flame away.
|
Well, I thought you were directing it at me. I just want to make it clear that I don't roll that way. If you have an opposing opinion I
will hear you out and if you are a constructive member of the forum (and you are) I
will always respect your position.
I understand what you're saying about the OP... The battery disconnect was an issue with me.
But that aside, I am not afraid to admit I was wrong. You and Bullitt were right. I didn't think it could have been SRM based on my experiences with the system, but it was.