View Single Post
Old 07-06-2019, 07:04 AM   #19 (permalink)
cv129
A True Z Fanatic
 
cv129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,222
Drives: 09 Nismo, 16 Nismo
Rep Power: 163995
cv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptionZero View Post
I remember reading about this

Where the spring is located is physically changed when u go from OEM type to true type
Since the OEM spring rates are based on oem locations, and the tuners are using that same geometry to do their math, it stands to reason that changing that spring location changes the geometry and requires new math to find ideal spring rates
I wouldn’t say geometry has changed. The arc of which the arms move are still the same. There’s no change to how camber and toe build up as the springs get compressed.

It’s the physics that changed. Imagine using the same spring, moving the spring outward to the hub makes it much harder to compress the spring, therefore a lower spring rate is needed to compensate.
__________________
Setrab | RE-71 | SPL | JRZ | Nismo | ARK | Whiteline | RacingBrake | CJM Oil Pan | Ti shield
cv129 is offline   Reply With Quote