Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportConvert
Id not. I dont trust it at all, and 1 year old is hardly a reliability test. This is why I went with the cx5 instead of the slightly more athletic Alfa.
|
Slightly? What car planet are you on? You OBVIOUSLY haven't driven the Alfa. Your opinions are a joke... I mean really. The Mazda 3 and 6 are nice driving cars for what they are...
But you're ACTUALLY COMPARING the driving dynamics of RWD to FWD and making this statement.
You are comparing throttle response of 280hp turbo engine to a 186hp na engine. Are you comparing the zf 8 speed to whatever is in a mazda...
You can't out accelerate. Outurn out handle or outdrive the Alfa in any human way possible.
Do you say things to get a rise out of people? Or are you this mind numbingly delusional?
As far as the Alfa 2.0. It's a global engine. A derivative of a tigershark which is a reliable engine but the Alfa engine is built way more solid to handle much more power kinda like an Evo engine.
You're just so delusional it's unreal... Import, go back to sleep. Go troll a RAV 4 or CR-V forum or stop sniffing the cow manure SMH.
Show me one professional race car driver comparing a cx5 to a giulia and maybe I'll consider your mindless dribble trying to justify your ridiculous unenthusiastic CUV purchase ..