Quote:
Originally Posted by markesc
|
Can you please explain why this is significant?
In calculating their peak diaphragm displacement volume (if I'm getting this right), the TM65 III is at 1258. I've been really happy with my 165's with a noticably lower 390. I just don't know what that means in application.
Is it basically having to move 3x less to hit the same frequencies? More efficient, meaning more volume out of the same power?