Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna-F1
What do you mean by that? You mean because I’m using your approximated TQ numbers? That’s not my fault. My calculations are the same ones used by everyone, including the software used by a dyno.
|
OK... You for some reason have an issue... Regardless of the calculator your using. I am pulling from two individual dyno sheets. I am making estimations based on graph dashes. I am giving comparable differences between two graphs. You are taking this information which I have stated is an approximation/estimation and using it as a stringent number. Again these are approximations of TQ and HP and the delta between them. two different cars with the exact same setup from fuel to a2a to supercharger, piping and routing. Same boost levels same dyno type and same fuel. There is a small advantage to the GTR conversion yet your all up in arms.
I have admitted where I was wrong. I didn't defend my wrong information in fact I removed it as to not confuse people and to not falsely prop up the gtr conversion.
With all that said. Topgunz my apologies for the thread derailment. I simply wanted to address the question on the gtr conversion and the statement that it is an aesthetics only mod. I have always stated that this product is something people should look for in higher boost applications. In lower boost applications as the example used here the gains will be minimal. In the higher boost applications the differential tends to grow.
Now back on topic. This is all I will speak on this subject. Again my apologies for the derailment.