Quote:
Originally Posted by sizziano
No offense but this is closed clickbait garbage.
|
No offense taken. However, if you’re calling some of these cars garbage, then I’ll just have to say, I disagree with your assessment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JARblue
I guess it depends on how you define iconic. For the most part, the cars in this list are more attainable than some other cars that could be on the list. The McLaren F1 is a phenomenal car, especially when you consider it's NA and how it stacks up against boosted competition. But I could see an argument that the F40 is a little more visually recognizable and might fit a definition of iconic a bit better.
One could argue Koenigsegg should have a car (One:1) on there, too.
|
Agreed JAR, everyone’s definition of iconic differs. Personally I think the author did a good job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormWhite
Audi R8 & Bugatti Veyron?
|
Yes, I don’t think you’re wrong at all. Like my post above, it depends on your definition of iconic. It appears the author’s definition of iconic is cars that were made in the 60’s-80’s and that’s fine as those cars have stood the test of time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanker
Who or what the @#%* is Carophile?
|
Haha yeah, I googled them and they do have quite a few articles online and seem pretty cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerafian
miata was on the list...Im not sure how much I can trust the writer of this article now :/
|
Well I’m sure a lot of Miata owners might disagree with you. If you check the history of car sales in the US, the Miata has sold more cars then the Z over the past 5 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Rat
still mopping up the drool over that Ferrari Daytona coupe in the list.
|
