View Single Post
Old 04-05-2018, 09:50 AM   #20 (permalink)
Jayhovah
Premium Member
 
Jayhovah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: St. Pete, FL
Posts: 3,848
Drives: 520whp Fire Breather
Rep Power: 86951
Jayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond reputeJayhovah has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrodz View Post
The difference is the 2.5" will spool faster and torque will come on strong due to the back pressure in the 2.5" exhaust. With the 3" you will see higher whp numbers and your tuner should be able to control the torque better which allows for the increase in top end. Spool not really a factor unless you are using a large turbo from what I can tell on our cars.
I disagree with this. There is no benefit to downsizing the exhaust for scavenging on a turbo motor, and it will only harm spool speed. You want to maximize the pressure differential across the the turbo to speed up the spool.. back pressure behind the turbo will only reduce spool, flow, and require more boost to make power.

For the 2.5" vs 3" exhaust question, its really just a question of diminishing returns.... It doesn't appear to me (and I haven't really looked at it with much scrutiny so I could certainly be wrong) that the 3" is going to do a whole lot more for you in a modest 500whp type of build.
__________________
2013 Gun Metallic Sport - Gamma V3 Twin Turbogized
DIY Gamma V3 TT Install * Jayhovah's Gamma V3 TT Install Pic'Z and Vid'Z * DIY: Washer Reservoir for the Boosted
Quote:
Originally Posted by redondoaveb
You've got a twin turbo sound system, I think you met your audio goals.
Jayhovah is offline   Reply With Quote