Thread: Help Please!
View Single Post
Old 03-29-2018, 04:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
turtle64b
Track Member
 
turtle64b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3366
turtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoulaZ View Post
Turbulence as reason make sense. What doesn't is how changing from W2A to A2A affects Turbulence. Air still flows past the same TBs in the same manner, albeit more flow overall. I'd be pretty concerned the characteristics changed so much inside the intake manifold to necessitate a change in MAP location.
So you have two Mass Air Flow sensors that meter the air coming into the engine as it flows past them. There is also a Manifold Air Pressure sensor on the back driver's side of the intake manifold (stock or Stillen). With the a2w setup, that heat exchanger is in the way of air entering the intake manifold and getting to the engine. This can cause pressure fluctuations (turbulence) where the stock sensor position is. Moving the sensor to before that heat exchanger (n between the TBs) gives you a more accurate reading of manifold pressure.

With the a2a, that intercooler is not in the way and so the air flows through the TBs into a giant cavern (relatively no turbulence) before entering the engine.

Just my thought on the why, but I am not an expert.
turtle64b is offline   Reply With Quote