View Single Post
Old 03-09-2018, 12:04 PM   #20 (permalink)
johnnydrama
Track Member
 
johnnydrama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bloomington, IN
Age: 40
Posts: 602
Drives: Nismo & FPace SVR
Rep Power: 2231
johnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond reputejohnnydrama has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to johnnydrama
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeb View Post
I hear ya Quicksilvers, but no need to assume that is an absolute for all products. For example

vs K&N+z1 postMAF - often quoted as superior but this unit has a sealed box that mounts in the factory cai location. It has polymer piping which should have less heat soak then the more common metal piping, it should match or exceed the z1 postMAF. There is more surface area on a conical filter and you get more growl. Yes there are cost benefits to keeping stock but that mainly a factor for tighter budgets, a bigger concern in my case is warranty

vs Stillen (long tube) - apples to apples; no other mods or tune. The Gen3 specs a gain of 17 (z1 website) vs 15. Ya its manufacture data but that OK, a stillen 3 guy gonna do other mods and tune anyway. Therefore more cost to get the full benefit of a long tube cai, along with more labor and installation.

Side note on the low end loss conversation. One theory being that larger/longer tubing and better flow actually reduces air velocity at low speeds. I find it interesting that the OP noted the AEM has smaller than typical piping, perhaps by design for this reason. Just some observations; not an attempt to debate as its already been done in other threads. This is more of a product review
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRiZO View Post
The cult-like devotion to the Stillen intake on here is really weird lol. I thought we settled the CAI debate in the 90s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLarson View Post
Friend of mine had the following mods:

FI Test Pipes, AAM true Dual Exhaust 3", HKS High Flow Filters, Mishimoto Replacement Tubes. Dyno @ RT Tuning, 4th gear, STD: 310 whp 265 wtq.

Upgraded to the R2C intakes, which have a very similar design to the AEM: 315 whp, 269 wtq.

Attached, just in case it's helpful to someone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk View Post
Stillen G3's aren't made that well. They have a nasty lip where they weld the tube expansion near the filter. Second, is it takes a lot of care to ensure you're protecting your AC line. This AEM unit is about as good as a shorty is going to get. The Z1 intake is an easier install with no real flaws for people going for the longer tube CAI option. You'll still make power with the G3, but it's not the answer for people who don't put up with **** craftsmanship.
Agreed with all of these. I had the Stillen G3s, they aren't the end all be all for every application and definitely not the best for the price. If I were to do long-tubes I would go with the Z1 offering.
johnnydrama is offline   Reply With Quote