Quote:
Originally Posted by alcheng
the issue with the current PU is it consists many components and the cost from R&D to manufacturing is very costly, thus lots of manufactures are hesitating to go for it.
Thus I am, as many others are, thinking the current PU is not actually cost effective, it does cost more to build and it cost more for the teams to pay.
I wish the new engine will be a bit more simple and less costly, thus more manufactures can get involved, more competitive, thus the result is more exciting races.
|
Agreed, I am really liking what IMSA is doing in the Daytona prototype series along with the others. They are attracting a lot of new or previous manufacturers back to the game. It is pretty exciting to see the different PU and chassis combination on the track together.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk