View Single Post
Old 08-17-2017, 05:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
OptionZero
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,235
Drives: 15 370Z Nismo 6MT
Rep Power: 214100
OptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond repute
Default

It's not aggressive at all, certain people throwing term around way too loosely.

Folks run 19x9.5 +22 te37 sizing all the time with mild suspension setups (stock or shock/spring)

More proof:
OEM Nismo is 19x9.5 +40 front
A 19x9 +26 only extends 8mm out more. Thats . . . nothing.

If you have SPL front upper control arms your fitment options are basically limited only to the skill of your alignment guy.

i have 20x11 +15 in front with a 275/30, on OEM metal. I don't really wanna here anyone talk about how 19x9 +26 is aggressive. Its not even a finger's width past stock.

Everyone with a wheel question should read THIS POST: [Official] 370z wheel fitment guide (pics/specs) only
It's from the Wheel Fitment Guide thread

19x9.5 +22; 19x10.5 +12
265/35/19; 305/30/19
KW v3, height set with fender clearly above top of tire (about 1 finger gap)

I do not consider that aggressive. To me, thats "normal" - perfectly fine for all forms of driving and better than stock
Near stock would be considered "stupid"
my setup would be "aggressive"
widebody + bags would be "super aggressive"

And there's gradations between
__________________
OptionZero Build Thread

Last edited by OptionZero; 08-17-2017 at 05:42 PM.
OptionZero is offline   Reply With Quote