View Single Post
Old 07-28-2017, 08:36 AM   #22 (permalink)
2011 Nismo#91
A True Z Fanatic
 
2011 Nismo#91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,401
Drives: slowly
Rep Power: 40569
2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute2011 Nismo#91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YYZ View Post
The title should have read- Top spec boosted Type R and STI vs Nissan's aging Base naturally aspirated Z on a track.

They could have at least used a sport for a track comparison and it still would cost less. A Nismo would have been more appropriate.

Imagine if they compared base models. That would be hilarious.
Top models cars released in 2016 vs the base Z from 2009. Not to mention the other 2 are 4 seater 4 door cars both with turbo charged i4 cylinders vs a 2 door 2 seater NA v6. They might as well have thrown in a MX-5.
__________________
GTR TT 493Whp/431lbft, Ecutek, Southbend 6puck,Quaife, RPM RollBar 4Point, R888R, JRZ RSPro F(10R/10C) R(10R/6C) 1000f500r inlbs+150inlbs Tender, SPL everywhere.Full Specs

Last edited by 2011 Nismo#91; 07-28-2017 at 09:48 AM.
2011 Nismo#91 is offline   Reply With Quote